Thanks to technological advances, people have greater access to a variety of knowledge. Without going to schools, they can learn new skills by researching the internet and watching tutorial videos. Considering the improved accessibility of knowledge, I believe a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
A teacher needs to relate to students to understand students’ interests, which allows teachers to develop students’ passion for learning. As long as the students know what they’re interested in, they are more motivated to immerse themselves in the studies. On the other hand, some students have trouble finding their true passion for learning, and they recognize learning as something to be endured to get better grades and jobs. Exposed to teachers who broaden students’ horizons, the students are more prone to be motivated to explore the diverse fields of studies.
A teacher should help students to learn what the internet and technology cannot offer. Although modern technology improved access to knowledge, the students have difficulty dealing with an abundant amount of information. To overcome this challenge, teachers need to encourage students to identify what is the purpose of learning and how to apply knowledge and skills in practice. Teachers who can relate to students are more likely to inspire students because they know how to reach out to the young and to strengthen the bonds.
Teachers can learn from students by devoting themselves to understanding students. Although the teachers seem to be wiser than students in terms of having a greater amount of knowledge and experience, the teachers also have to continue learning how the world is changing and how they should create a better future with younger people. Teachers carry an important role not only in offering knowledge for the young but also in seeking better solutions to combat the current issues faced to the society with the protagonists of the future. Since what the students are interested in reflects on some aspects of society, it is helpful for teachers to address the generation gap with the adolescents by understanding the students’ points of view.
In conclusion, I believe a teacher’s role in relating to students is more important than offering excellent knowledge of the subjects being taught. Although the students can rely on technology to acquire a wide range of knowledge, they need a real human interaction to promote their academic interests and to shape value to create future society.
- Autonomous cars 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statements Children should not be allowed to play the video games 59
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internetaccess while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping intouch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO 10 Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago it c 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... explore the diverse fields of studies. A teacher should help students to learn ...
^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o shape value to create future society.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31951219512 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87516287721 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465853658537 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7990948974 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.294117647 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289244077445 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115206566288 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117075260159 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19270664189 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469938051429 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.