Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people argue that everyone has the right to express their views including teachers at school. They cite usually students will able to develop their enthusiasm about political leaders and able to know about social interaction and so forth to support their points. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that before expressing the views teachers should be aware about circumstances, and teachers should not express their political and social views in front of pupils for following two reasons.
To begin with, when the academic instructors elaborate political views among the students, it can put adverse effect on students because they will follow their opinions. As a matter of fact, students always consider their teacher as a role models. For instance, when I was in high school, I used to admire one politician and follow his principles, and I blindly started to imitate his style of talking. It was happened due to my teachers excessive praising habits towards that politician. It is important to follow the way forecasted by teachers because they usually makes students better and give precious knowledge to students. Thus, elucidating the political views in front of students can greatly impact on students.
Furthermore, discussing political views in front of pupils sparks the debate in the classroom and drifts students from their defined curriculum. For example, one of our instructors at school, always criticizes political so badly that one day it turns into debate because one of my friends was son of politician, and he was so annoyed that he counters our instructors. In fact, debate usually happens when people has different perspectives. Therefore, teachers should not discuss political views in front of students as emerges conflict.
To sum up, the issue of whether teachers should make their social or political opinion in front of young teenagers students is complex. Some suggested that to develop knowledge of students and to make familiar to society the educational instructors should give his/her views on such topics. Nevertheless, I still contend with these people and believe that teachers perception not only brings conflict in classroom, but also adversely effect on thinking ability of students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'cite'.
Suggestion: usually cite
...iews including teachers at school. They cite usually students will able to develop their ent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...casted by teachers because they usually makes students better and give precious knowl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge to students. Thus, elucidating the political views in front of students can...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. Furthermore, discussing political views in front of pupils sparks the deba...
^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...tend with these people and believe that teachers perception not only brings conflict in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35112359551 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74942896138 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508426966292 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0458773902 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0625 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323856290445 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115689853263 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701028652544 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209780155445 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508141877424 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.