Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Undoubtedly, since the born of man, teachers have been playing one of the most important roles in any society. People wonder whether teachers were more appreciated in the past time or not. In my opinion, teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past because they were the most educated people in society. Moreover, today, thanks to the development of technology, there are lots of information sources that will give you more information than any teacher.
First, Teachers were the most educated people in their societies. Thus, usually, a teacher had other roles too like a scientist, a doctor, etc. As a result, they had an important role in society that led them to gain more respect. On the contrary, today, most people have passed high education levels. Thus, there are many people who may be educated more than any teacher. For example, once, my grandfather told me some memories that they belong to when he was a child. He told me that they had a teacher who was the only person who was educated in their village. He wasn’t just an ordinary teacher, indeed, he was a doctor too. Everyone who had a health problem went to him and asked him for a checkup. Hence he examined them and gave them some drugs according to their disease. Thus, he was a very important valued person in that society.
Second, today, teachers were the only source of information. Whereas, today, thanks to the development of technology, people can get access to lots of information that is available for them. They can use the internet or they even can have a personal library in their smartphones or they can reach a lot of other professors by using Emails and telephone. In the past, people hadn’t any other resources and they have no choice except trusting to pieces of information that teachers told them. However, nowadays, people can search for their needs on the internet very easily. Thus, they may find a reference that refutes their teacher’s opinion. For example, once I was a student at university, there was a discussion about a physical problem among the professor and students. After several hours’ discussion, we decided to bring our evidence about that subject in the next session. Thus, all students start searching in different sources and gathering information. In the next session, we presented a lot of evidence and refutes the professors claim strongly. Therefore, we can easily access a lot of information through the internet and other available sources in the present. Hence, it is reasonable that teachers would be more appreciated in their society.
Based on the aforementioned reasons, it can be concluded that in the past teachers were more appreciated and valued in their society rather than today. Indeed, they not only were the most educated persons of their society but also they were the only source of information and people had no choice except trust their knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...r teachers were more appreciated in the past time or not. In my opinion, teachers were mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ent to him and asked him for a checkup. Hence he examined them and gave them some dru...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96537678208 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71100315788 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437881873727 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6687696994 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0689655172 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9310344828 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06896551724 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214485635241 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676792642671 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752207207845 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172080393987 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697811459016 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.