Criticism is one of the most significant factors while participating in various group projects. Regarding this, some people argue that it is not mandatory for people to take criticism in a group project to become successful. However, I personally agree with the aforementioned statement that it is necessary to take criticism to be successful in a group project for two reasons.
FIrst and foremost, taking in criticism can perfect the project. To be specific, one’s team members might think of some useful information that others didn’t, such as extra explanation in the details or a change in the design of the project. By taking in that criticism from other members of the group, the project will be more perfect, leading to success. For instance, I once had a group project with a friend in high school. Back then, I did not take in any advice from my friend, and the grade that we received was very low. Later when I had a group project, I actively took in criticism and advice. By that, the teacher complimented us for making a great project, and we got a good grade. This clearly shows that one can become more successful if they take in criticism.
In addition, taking criticism can enhance relationships between members. In fact, team members feel that they are being appreciated when people contemplate their ideas. As a result, team members can bond and have stable relationships throughout the project and the entire school year. To illustrate, when I was a university student, I had a group project with a person that I wanted to become closer to. I respected his ideas and he also appreciated mine. Through the process, we became good friends, and I still contact him until today. This example undoubtedly illustrates the second reason that taking in criticism can lead to long lasting relationships between team members.
Admittedly, some could argue that members could give unnecessary advice and people can still get a good grade despite not taking in critical advice. In contrast, as critical thinking can improve the quality of the project, and people can have good relationships with members, I personally agree with the statement mentioned above.
- Some people think children should have unlimited access to the internet Others believe parents should supervise their children s use of the internet Which do you believe 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to cooperate with others is more important today than in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Television advertising directed toward young children should not be allowed 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have better lives than their parents had when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have better lives than their parents had when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, then, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00826446281 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8229562975 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498622589532 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7715583026 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11712627654 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419208679671 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381582813379 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875212940445 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178082456782 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.