The internet has become one of the most important tools in people and children’s daily lives. Regarding this, some people believe that children should have unlimited access to the internet. However, I personally think that children should have their parents supervising them while using the internet for two reasons: better health and understanding.
First and foremost, children’s health will improve if parents control their access to the internet. To be specific, by limiting the time children spend online, they can avoid eye strain from excessive smartphone or computer use and have more time for beneficial activities like homework or playing baseball with friends. For example, my brother used to spend an excessive amount of time on the internet, which had negative effects on his eyesight and limited his time for other activities. As a solution, my mother started supervising his internet usage, and consequently, his eyesight improved as he reduced his smartphone usage, and his grades significantly increased. This demonstrates that parents can enhance their children's health by monitoring their internet activities.
In addition, children and parents will understand each other more. In detail, when parents supervise their children, they create an environment where both can communicate with each other, leading to a greater opportunity for understanding. An observational study held in 2019 at Boston university compared two groups of families: one who controlled their children accessing the internet, and one who did not. The results showed that there was 62% more communication between parents and children. This undoubtedly proves that if parents supervise their children, there will be more communication, resulting in a more understanding family.
Admittedly, some could argue that there will be less conflict, and children can readily obtain information if parents don’t have an eye on their children. However, as children’s health increases and more understanding will occur if parents limit their children, I personally state that children should have their parents watch them for excessive amounts of time on the internet.
- Some people think children should have unlimited access to the internet Others believe parents should supervise their children s use of the internet Which do you believe 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In a team those who do not accept others criticism cannot succeed 71
- Television advertising directed toward young children should not be allowed 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have better lives than their parents had when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some people think children should have unlimited access to the internet Others believe parents should supervise their children s use of the internet Which do you believe 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, regarding, so, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6472392638 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9619022592 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.228334245 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.733333333 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474716542978 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194238967837 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131473492526 0.0662205650399 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340329710052 0.162205337803 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149882959694 0.0443174109184 338% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.