Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
These days, children spend more time doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports. However, they should be given more time to do whatever they want.
In today’s competitive academic environment, all hold schools and educational centers accountable for students’ well-being in prospective lives. Accordingly, choosing a highly effective way of training plays a key factor in the youth’s lives. The majority of people think that adolescents had better spend plenty of their time on school programs as much as they can. Contrary to popular belief, I possess the conviction that children should spend enough time on their desired activity to both enhance their social characteristics and soothe their minds off daily stresses and anxieties. In what follows, I will delve into the paramount reasons to substantiate my perspective.
First and foremost, it is crucial that juveniles improve their social traits such as participation in group work, obeying social rules, and so on besides their academic knowledge. Indeed, individuals would enter bigger societies like work environments soon after graduation; therefore, familiarity with other aspects of life would be essential to stay on good terms with others. As a case in point, being interested in photography, my brother spends a great deal of his time working as a newcomer photographer in a firm. Although it is not pertaining to his university major, he develops his personality as a mature person with his colleagues and boss. Had he merely concentrated on university activities, he would not have promoted his social features and could not have been prosperous in his career so far.
The other point worth mentioning is that young people need to liberate their minds from everyday anxieties. It is crystal clear that the more pressure students endure in their educational environments, the lower the performance level they would show. Thus, schools must not assign them a heavy workload. Otherwise, this issue would have adverse effects on their mental health and even could lead them to erroneous results. By way of illustration, some of my close friends and I spend our leisure time watching champions league matches every weekend. It is such an excellent program that we get refreshed for the whole workweek. It goes without saying that in the same roughly short period, we have been able to enhance our performances in everyday activities and obtain impressive accomplishments in the field of study. This example reveals how much these recreations could profoundly impact individuals’ mental health and productivity.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that students had better spend a portion of their time on their own intended activities, not only because of improving their social characteristics to prosper in the future vocation but also for prevailing over daily pressure they might have in the academic environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | dedimaryono | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-23 | P@rs@ | 93 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team does it have a negative effect on their lives 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Colleges or universities should offer more courses to prepare students for the future before they start working 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past 82
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great others believe that this policy will discourage employees 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38372093023 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01291971935 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597674418605 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.959571873 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.842105263 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127200425442 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369755619689 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383894252674 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792837140867 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261914929727 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.