Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Colleges or universities should offer more courses to prepare students for the future before they start working.
In today’s competitive academic environment, all hold universities and colleges accountable for students’ well-being in their prospective life. Accordingly, choosing a highly effective way for training plays a key factor in gaining this intention. The majority of people think that educational centers had better compel young learners to attend more classes in order to succeed in their future careers. Contrary to popular belief, I possess the conviction that students should merely concentrate on their major courses as much as they can. In what follows, I will delve into the paramount reasons to substantiate my perspective.
First and foremost, universities and colleges are major responsible to unearth the young’s potential talents and abilities. On the other hand, students must have enough time and required concentration to encounter problems, and consequently, improve their skills, achieve their personal best, and find innovative solutions. As a case in point, when I started my major in university, unlike/in contrast to most of my classmates, I used to take only a few main classes each semester. Following adopting this approach, I got good grades and even awarded a scholarship owing to spending plenty of time on my assignments and exams. Besides, I carried out several remarkable studies after becoming a senior student, which resulted in two papers and a successful patent. Although I graduated from university after five years, I was admitted to the master entrance exam soon after graduation, which was unreachable for most of my classmates. Had I taken more courses, I probably would have acquired superficial scientific knowledge and could not have obtained such impressive accomplishments.
The other point worth mentioning is that the more courses students take, the less practical work experience they will gain. Indeed, cutting back on theoretical courses helps talented learners get a part-time job or do an internship in their specialty to be familiar with the workplace and their prospective vocation. By way of illustration, this was what happened to me in the senior year. By showing up to a few interviews, I received a great job offer in my own specialized field. Fortunately, I got off to a promising start, thanks to my profound knowledge and substantial achievements. Only after a few years, I made a breakthrough in my job and became a chief executive officer in the firm. This example reveals passing a few courses each semester makes a big break to obtain precious experience, and eventually, get a lucrative job in the future.
In conclusion, it is crucial that students take essential classes at universities, not only because of acquiring more comprehensive knowledge of academic subjects but also for its technical knowledge besides theoretical issues.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Colleges or universities should offer more courses to prepare students for the future before they start working 93
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great others believe that this policy will discourage employees 93
- Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of food nutrition and healthy eating 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement These days children spend more time doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they should be given more time to do whatever they want 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38636363636 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16733636169 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609090909091 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3477183154 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189845734653 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491657384924 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437474662288 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107849146386 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033382929375 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.