Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great, others believe that this policy will discourage employees.
In the modern era, one’s vocation plays a significant role in his life. Indeed, working is an inseparable part of human life. The majority of people think that working on weekends would improve socio-economic terms. Contrary to popular belief, I possess the conviction that extreme working would adversely affect people’s lives due to lacking enough time for spending with their families as well as its excessive mental tensions. In what follows, I will delve into the paramount reasons to substantiate my perspective.
First and foremost, it is vital that everybody spend adequate time to have a normal life with his spouse and children. It is crystal clear that ignoring family members would bring about severe problems in their relationships, which could even overshadow one’s job. As a case in point, when my close friend was employed in an accredited firm, he tried to show off himself by working overtime even on weekends in order to have a breakthrough, and subsequently, get a promotion in a short period. Although his wife used to spend most of her time alone in their apartment for a few years, soon after, she could not bear this circumstance, and unfortunately, got divorced from his husband. Had my friend allocated more time to his family, his spouse would not have been made such a tough decision.
The other point worth mentioning is that, in today’s hectic life, people need to free up some time for the liberation of daily stresses and anxieties. Having pastime with immediate family and friends help individuals have a good time after a busy week in the workplace. Based on my experience, the more one gets involved in a heavy workload, the lower the performance level he would show off. By way of illustration, my brother and I indulge ourselves by watching some champions league matches every weekend. It is such an exciting program that we get refreshed for the whole workweek. In a short roughly period, we have been able to enhance our abilities and skills in everyday activities and obtain impressive accomplishments in our specialties. This example reveals how much these recreations could profoundly impact individuals’ performance.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that employees should not be allowed to communicate with each other concerning business issues on weekends, not only because of spending enough time with their family but also for prevailing over daily pressure and lessening their mental tensions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Colleges or universities should offer more courses to prepare students for the future before they start working 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past 82
- Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of food nutrition and healthy eating 93
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great others believe that this policy will discourage employees 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o have a breakthrough, and subsequently, get a promotion in a short period. Altho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1525 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9016159291 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6175 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8248341359 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127144983336 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034761170005 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325536704093 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777418552483 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348638145627 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.