Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "We can learn more from people at a higher level than us (like teachers) than from people who are at the same level as us".
With the pace of life speeding up and with this galloping rate in which societies are flourishing, learning is an indispensable part of every individual’s life. Many people believe that a higher level person with more excellent knowledge and experience is worth individuals paying attention for various, informative things can be learned. From my own perspective, learning from people at a higher level of understanding and knowledge would be beneficial rather than those at the same level. In the following paragraphs, I lend credence to this view.
First and foremost, a higher level individual is supposed to be trained more effectively, cultivating a sense of comfort and privileged to be under the tutelage of such instructor. Moreover, gaining more experience over time, people can convey knowledge and information more thoroughly and comprehensively. Imagine a freshman student supposed to learn basic marketing concepts. To be a successful marketing manager in the near future, he needs to heighten his awareness of marketing through real cases. In the meanwhile, the majority of university professors have prior experience in their expertise. So, this student can earn miscellaneous information from his professors rather than his peers, not having enough knowledge and experiences about marketing key factors, thereby improving his marketing proficiencies. Therefore, the importance of a higher level instructor widely stands out more and more.
Moreover, people can rely on people with a higher level of knowledge with more ease. To be more elucidate, it has been acknowledged that individuals show their inclination toward learning from a superior rank person. Specifically, it stands to the reason that their instruction culminates in negative outcomes hardly ever, providing a sense of satisfaction for others. As an example, assume a consultant giving you advice about how to get married. This person has had manifold cases about marriage so that you can be correctly oriented by his recommendations. Therefore, people can trust advisor more conveniently rather than their friends’suggestion. In fact, nothing is more gratifying than making a wise decision based on proper advice.
In the final analysis, it can be concluded that most people tend to learn things from a higher level person in knowledge and experience. This is because this individual is trained in their expertise and can be more effective; also, people can rely on the superior level more easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-09 | niloo.candy | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | axellese | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree? It is more important to keep your old friends rather than making new friends. 78
- TPO51 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "We can learn more from people at a higher level than us (like teachers) than from people who are at the same level as us". 80
- Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together. 73
- Opening a new place such as shopping malls, food courts, or recreational areas brings several changes to the community. These businesses can be an underlying cause of the prosperity for any given society. Inaugurating a new restaurant in my neighborhood w 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5078125 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26590222607 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533854166667 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7544782815 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321278636108 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103503536808 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993848212888 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230502478811 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657531810395 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.