Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
In the modern world, communication tools significantly impact people's connections in all steps of their lives, especially in the academic period that they have to do many projects. One of the essential tools developed in the last decades and has a big effect on intellectual interaction is email. Some people believe that this tool could be an efficient alternative instead of a conventional method like communication in person, and others persist that it could not and prefer to communicate in person. Although it is hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I really subscribe to this conviction that speaking in person has some benefits that convince me to select this option. The following reasons would elaborate on this thesis.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that comes to my mind is that visiting in person saves lots of time and helps finish the project in minimum time. It is crystal clear, preparing, sending, and waiting for an email response takes a lot of time, and time is a master key in our life. Besides, sometimes many problems occur, and emails fail to deliver. Clearly, talking directly to someone is like a ping pong game which gives you the score after many tries at the minimum time. However, using email, this process sometimes needs many days to reach an acceptable result. For example, two years ago, I wanted to run a code and found a bug in the codes. Therefore, I started to send an email to my supervisor. Needless to say that after five days, we did not solve the problem. Finally, she asked me to go to her office and found the main bug in just ten minutes.
In addition, writing a text always has misunderstanding because the feeling of the person who wrote the text is missed in the text; also, we cannot say all of the issues in an email. On the contrary, when we meet others, we could easily transfer our idea to others, straightforwardly and with the right feeling. Besides, in this situation, body language could have a significant role in sharing our notions. Statistics show that communicating in person reduces the solving time of problem three times because it removes any vague in the question raised by someone.
Last but not least, communicating in person is more sympathetic than email and keeps a good connection and relation between colleagues during the courses. When I was in Dubai, I attended a management course and found many friends there because of asking some questions in person from classmates. Generally speaking, having a debate about a subject could help make a good friendship with other colleagues. It is clear that I could not find these lovely friends if I asked my question by email.
All in all, Although there are some exemptions that are excluded from a general rule, I support this idea that asking questions about the project in person is much better than sending an email. It solves the problem at a minimum time, makes sympathy, and eliminates any misunderstanding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-20 | ranadanesh72 | 73 | view |
- People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood the area where they live than now 31
- Should government spend money on public parks for everyone or build a sport field for students 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 73
- The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity. 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or meet 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and found a bug in the codes. Therefore, I started to send an email to my supervi...
^^
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
... in the codes. Therefore, I started to send an email to my supervisor. Needless to say that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 870, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...found the main bug in just ten minutes. In addition, writing a text always has m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...missed in the text; also, we cannot say all of the issues in an email. On the contrary, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riends if I asked my question by email. All in all, Although there are some exem...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, really, so, therefore, for example, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 507.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83234714004 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77677008281 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542406311637 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6417841141 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142099145613 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342532862002 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351633093615 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794183051574 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216201592968 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.