Some people argue that writing an e-mail is a great way to communicate about the project for colleagues or classmates. They cite the convenience of the online communication platform to support their viewpoint. However,I strongly disagree with these people and believe that in-person meeting provides far more advantages for group project. I feel this way for two specific reasons which I will thoroughly examine in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, face-to-face communication is necessary for the team because team members can have a better understanding of each other. For example, people can observe other people’s facial expressions and tone of voice when they speak which help to clarify or contradict the messages being said. Without these non-verbal languages, team members will not be able to tell if they are on the same page and, as a result, they cannot reach consensus easily. It is important for team members to get a clear idea of the group because it makes the team run more effectively and efficiently. Thus, meeting in person is beneficial for team members.
Secondly, in person meeting is better since it helps the team solve the problems faster. For instance, team members do not have to standby for another person to be available to reply the e-mails and can discuss the issue instantly. With the presence of the time consumed waiting for other members, the team will come to an agreement slower and, at the same time, delay the working process. It is crucial for the group to have an ability to sort out difficulties in a short time because once faced with an emergency, they have to handle the situation immediately. Therefore, face-to-face communication is important for group projects.
To conclude, the problem of whether classmates/colleagues should communicate in person or via e-mail about the project is complex. Nevertheless, I still contend that face-to-face meeting is advantageous for group projects due to its benefits for the team’s clear understanding and rapid communication.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- TOEFL essay Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- TOEFL essay Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Imagine you want to get better grades in school or get a promotion or a raise at work Which of the following would you take Do more work than existing requirements Participate more actively in group discussions or contribute your own ideas 70
- TOEFL essay Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...form to support their viewpoint. However,I strongly disagree with these people and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24233128834 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05071643869 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7791581806 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8125 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275853211871 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100529688697 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585959596364 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193075262631 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757453542317 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.