Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Homework, the basic part of each student's school life, triggers heated discussion over whether students learn more effectively when they mush finish it together. Individual assignment, in some people' view, is more effective than group projects. On the contrary, my perspective is that students will definitely learn better when work together for the following reasons.

To begin with, never should we ignore that when completing group project, students will learn more knowledge compared with finishing it individually. In detail, after spending same amount of time, students who work colleaborately will gain more information and expertise. For example, when finishing assignments, students may have to go to the library to read some relative books, or search for some background facts or useful information on the internet. This process will definitely cost a pletha of time when students finish it by themselves alone. However, with some group members who shoulder some burdens, each individual in this group only need to do certain part of the tasks. After finishing the part they assigned to, they can share the information they gathered with each other. As a result, during this process, each member are only supposed to allocate less time but get more knowledge. However, students, undoubtedly, will spend much more time to obtain same amount of proficiency if they work alone.

In addition, what should be emphasized is that when working as a group, students will get deeper and comprehensive understanding of the knowledge they learned. To be more specific, when confronting problems, group members could discuss together, during which they will learn from different perspectives and are consequently more likely to solve that problem. However, if a student only completes the project on his own, he may get stuck in his stereotype thinking mode, and thus find it arduous to get the solution. What's more, since each student has different advantages and disadvantages, when working together, group members could exert their corresponding expertise . Therefore, group project serves as a platform for students to learn from each other. For example, students who are not good at paper writing will gain access to learn writing skills from partners who masters it, this is much more effective than learn it independently.

In conclusion, students should be encouraged to finish group projects because during this course students will learn more efficiently and deeper.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... is that students will definitely learn better when work together for the following re...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...us find it arduous to get the solution. Whats more, since each student has different ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 670, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ould exert their corresponding expertise . Therefore, group project serves as a pl...
^^
Line 5, column 840, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to write'.
Suggestion: to write
...paper writing will gain access to learn writing skills from partners who masters it, th...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43410852713 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80936228949 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519379844961 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6432353371 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336259159694 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12399167014 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558130018036 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236900329767 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488570184377 0.0645574589148 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.