Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is hard to deny that it may waste time to learn different skills and such a fact leads impressionable people to generate that workers are less favorable when they are required to do various work during the workdays than doing monotonous tasks all day long. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as social relationship, fiance, and career development are concerned, I strongly hold that employees are more willing to do similar jobs rather than different kinds of tasks all the day.
First and foremost, having variety of tasks can borden one's social network, as one can interact with different people during different tasks. To be more specific, a worker will meet many people when he is participating abundant task, which enhance his ability to cooperate and communicate with others. Not to mention that this worker may be able to make new friends more easily compare to the one who does similar task all day because of encountering numerous people can improve his social capability. Thus, workers are more satisfied with many tasks as they can have more friends and can get help from them.
Futhermore, workers with a lot of distinctive work experience can have more opportunities to earn money indicates that they have more financial priority. Take the case of my uncle, who has one casual work and three part-time jobs. He works as an acadamic tutor, a waiter, and a blogger after his offical work is done. As a result, these part-time jobs enable my uncle to have much more disposable income compare to his collegues. Had it not been for my uncle have different types of tasks to do, he would never has the money to fulfill his demand.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that working on variety of tasks is not efficient for workers. Ironically, workers with different job experience are able to find their true interest easily and continue work on it against the voice of wasting time. Therefore, having different tasks to do can do a favor on workers career development.
In a nutshell, I maintain that workers are more eager to take distinctive taks a day than doing the same work. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from James Madison goes, as long as the reason of a man contributes fallible, different opinions will be formed, and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree it s better to take the most difficult or challenging classes in the university or college even if you will not get the good grades in them 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 81
- In what way can high school teachers better improve students study interests a applying more technology in class b explaining the close connection between what they are learning and the world c arranging students to work in group assignments instead of wo 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89830508475 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67797704791 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523002421308 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6166663492 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.388888889 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376711320192 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120909042236 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961958256347 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215131523766 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771709415088 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89830508475 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67797704791 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523002421308 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6166663492 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.388888889 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376711320192 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120909042236 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961958256347 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215131523766 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771709415088 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.