Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Younger children (aged less than 12 years) would get benefits if they are also taught different subjects by different teachers every day.
Commonly, parents and schools employ various measures to improve the study effect of the children to help them embrace a promising future. Some people argue that younger children benefit a lot when they are taught different subjects by different teachers, while others disagree. In my opinion, it is a favorable way to deliver different subjects every day. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
For starter, children at this age generally lack the capability of concentrating on a single topic for a long time. Therefore, they may easily get tired and sleepy if they have to take the same class all day along, which adversely affects their study effect. In contrast, teaching different subjects can add colour to their study process. My own experience is a compelling model of that. When I was nine, my parents forced me to have a math class from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. during the summer vocation. However, I became eager to switch to a more interesting class and started to listen to the lecture absently shortly after the class began. To my parents' disappointness, I failed to improve my math grades after that summer vocation and even abominated solving mathmatic problems more than before. This example shows that teaching children the same subject may be unfortunately unproductive.
Besides, children can have the opportunity to explore ideas in various fields if different teachers teach them every day. As a result, they will look forward to what they will study the next day, enhancing their motivation to go to school. As research conducted by an elite institution, most primary schools in this country take the instruction method above to educate their students. It reveals that students can enrich their imagination and combine knowledge of different subjects to deepen their understanding of the world. For example, a student can use his arithmetic skills to caculate the speed of light and sound, thus realizing that light goes much faster than sound in nature. In this example, exposure to math knowledge makes it possible to apprehend the physical knowledge behind the natural phenomenon.
Admittedly, children can adapt to the environment more efficiently when taught by the same teacher. However, the advantage cannot last long. Conversely, they will soon expect to change factors of the learning environment like the teacher, the subject, and the classmates as soon as they get used to the circumstance. In a word, children can benefit more in a long term when they study in a more diverse environment.
From the reasons stated above, we can safely conclude that it is conducive to let different teachers to teach pupils different subjects because it can lift their spirits and promote their all-round development.
- Imagine that you are considering taking action to improve your performance in order to get better grades marks at school or to get a promotion and higher pay at work You are considering the following two actions A Doing additional work or extra assignment 86
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than it was in the past 90
- Nowadays many job interviewers and employers are looking for various additional sources of information to better understand a job applicant Which is the best way for the employers to better know the situation of a job applicant Contacting previous employe 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i feel, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12527472527 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76463424557 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540659340659 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9958070549 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.391304348 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7826086957 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78260869565 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244805989434 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693060811256 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070714180801 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146702485792 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564928963234 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.