Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.
Throughout last centuries zoos were an extremely widely-spread source of entertainment for people. In the modern society, however, this has become one of the most controversial topics. I personally suppose that zoos have their both advantages and drawbacks.
First and foremost, I wholeheartedly believe that in the 21th century people should realize that animals also have rights and they should not remain in captivity for mere entertainment. Especially it is vital to note that, unfortunately, most of the zoos simply cannot or do not even want to afford maintaining favorable conditions for the animals. In the majority of the zoos and circuses animals have to survive in tiny cages without receiving proper care. For instance, during my stay in Japan I was sincerely excited to visit the distinguished Ueno zoo. Apparently, it is one of the world’s oldest and most famous ones. Nevertheless, observing the poor facilities wild animals, specifically monkeys, lived in I was really shocked.
In addition, it is worth mentioning that the situation is getting even worse, considering the obvious fact that zoos are primarily targeted for children. It cannot be denied that the behavior of large groups of them is virtually impossible to control. This results in children harming the environment of the zoo and distracting the animals’ peace. I have faced this type of attitude in my own life. I had an experience of volunteering at the local zoo. My responsibilities included feeding the animals and check their physical state daily. I mostly enjoyed it, besides one adverse factor. Sadly the children were never restricted by their parents and they ended up screaming at the aviaries, taking pictures with flashlight triggering an aggressive approach among some of the carnivores.
On the other hand, in terms of ecology and zoology, even natural habitats tend to be hazardous for its dwellers. Zoos can play a role of excellent shelters. There is a huge tendency for mammals to actually live much longer lives in the captivity.
To sum up, I generally substantiate that zoos are cruel sources of entertainment that sooner or later should be banned, as the preponderance of them do not meet appropriate requirements. However, unarguably they create safer conditions for them.
- TPO integrated 3
- A zoo has no useful purpose 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A zoo has no useful purpose Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 7
- Little Ice Age 3
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to maintain'.
Suggestion: to maintain
...ly cannot or do not even want to afford maintaining favorable conditions for the animals. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 766, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...triggering an aggressive approach among some of the carnivores. On the other hand, in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve much longer lives in the captivity. To sum up, I generally substantiate tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, besides, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, well, for instance, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27322404372 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0647067338 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620218579235 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6903881604 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7272727273 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0756722934619 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214580437951 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0208706133371 0.0737576698707 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417269580756 0.150856017488 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124847326997 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.