Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I agree. I think that government should spend more money in support of the arts instead of supporting athletics such as state-sponsored Olympics teams. Below are three reasons to supply my claim.
First of all, government cares about reputation, and standing up for the arts can help them establish good fame. Take my country, Taipei, as an example. The government of Taipei dedicated the most of expenditure ten years ago to build an art museum and protected a variety of old arts from being destroyed. It goes without saying that it's an adventurous and huge move in the modern city. Thus, people from all over the world came to visit the prestigious cite in Taipei. As a result, by constructing the art museum, Taipei government acquired a world-known and global-recognized reputation.
Second, government places emphasis on citizen's amusement in leisure time, and buttressing for the arts may enable residents to have a better life. For example, my parents always have a desire to visit some arts museums during the weekends. To elaborate, with the funding from governments, there is no denying that art museums can elevate to another level such as digital paintings, 3D pictures etc. Therefore, all citizens have this chance to have a better visual enjoyment. Apparently, it would become a nice and comfortable state where people want to live in.
Last but not least, budget control is always a big concern for government, but supporting athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams would cost an arm and a leg. For instance, the expenses of all the athletes such as training fee, coach fee, equipment fee or even the meals fee are totally a huge number. Accordingly, with the limited budget, the government cannot take the risk to cover the money which is unstable and hard to count. On the other hand, building an art museum is an one-off expense money. That is, after opening the place, it remains the maintenance fee in the future. It won't cost as much as supporting the athletics.
In sum, I firmly believe that governments should spend more money in support of the arts, as governments consider factors such as reputation, quality of citizen's lifestyle and budget control. All of these can be satisfied with standing for the arts, while I am not certain supporting athletics alone can do the same.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nown and global-recognized reputation. Second, government places emphasis on ci...
^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
... Second, government places emphasis on citizens amusement in leisure time, and buttress...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 486, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e other hand, building an art museum is an one-off expense money. That is, after o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99226804124 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8274535017 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569587628866 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2368364113 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2380952381 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4761904762 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290658137325 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800414485988 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124299884619 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206584853087 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155255915714 0.0645574589148 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.