Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Jobs are important in our lives. They give us the financial ability to meet our basic needs such as food, clothing and shelter. Some people think it was easier to find a good job in the past. Others disagree with this point of view. I agree with the latter group. I think it is easier to find a job with successful future nowadays, and I will elaborate on my reasons in the rest of this essay.
First, there are many useful websites, magazines and books that provide expert analysis about future job market of different careers. Most of such resources did not exist in the past, or if they did it was not as easy as today to access their content. For example, when I was graduated in economics from University of Tehran about four years ago, I signed in a couple of websites that send me regular bulletins about available positions in economics job market. They also gave me additional information about working hours, salaries and specifications required. Finally, after careful evaluations I made my decision and I am happy about it. I think if it were not for the information these websites provided for me I would not have my job today.
Second, there are also professional institutions that publish job market projections for variety of careers. They use advanced mathematical approaches to forecast different aspects of job market. For example how many economists will be needed in next ten years, or what will be their average salary. These statistical information can help everybody to make a better decision about their future jobs. For instance, when I was at university, I often checked the Federal Reserve. It helped me to anticipate the future better. I chose development economics as my major because I thought it would have good job prospects when I graduate. And it had. In fact, when I was graduated I find a proper job in in my field in less than a month. And I partly owe it to the good information that Federal Reserve and other similar institutions had provided.
In conclusion, I think it is easier now to find a job with good future. It is mainly because of the enormous websites, magazines and books that provide expert analysis about different careers. And also professional institutions that provide us with statistical projections about future job markets. I think we are fortunate to live in the era of communication boom.
- Communal online encyclopedia problems 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...hen I was graduated I find a proper job in in my field in less than a month. And I pa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80295566502 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78849064368 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495073891626 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5792964826 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168477152778 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489754879983 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471669647322 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115825190859 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568326447877 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.