Communal online encyclopedia problems
The article states that online communal encyclopedias have important problems, and provides three supporting reasons. However, the professor says that article's judgment is a result of ignorance and how far the online encyclopedias have come. She refutes each of the reading's reasons.
Fist, the article proposes the lack of academic credentials as a possible problem. The professor opposes this point by stating that traditional encyclopedias are not completely accurate either. In fact, it is not possible to find an encyclopedia without errors online or offline. She says it is easier to correct errors in online encyclopedias. She adds that errors in traditional encyclopedias may remain for decades.
Second, the article states that online encyclopedias may contain fabricated or corrupt information due to the hackers or vandals. However, the professor refutes this point by explaining that online encyclopedias present crucial facts in the read-only format which cannot be changed by users. They also get the advantage of experts who monitor the changes in online contents and eliminate the wrong ones.
Third, the article states that online encyclopedias do not tend to focus on important subjects. The professor rejects this point. She explains that traditional encyclopedias have space problems so a group of experts decides on what materials should be included. Therefore, traditional encyclopedias do not show the great range of people's interests. On the other hand, online encyclopedias do not have the space problem. Thus, they cover academic articles and also articles on other interesting subjects for people. In fact, this is an advantage of online encyclopedias that they show the diversity of users' interests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
- Communal online encyclopedia problems 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55681818182 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04243546645 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507575757576 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4346765355 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423694335768 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135191677174 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950676241674 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260074295744 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352129336839 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 53.8541721854 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.