Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
As everything in life is like a coin that has two different slides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. After all, each and every question or topic requires careful deliberation in that there are multiple variables to a truth. Even though some may admanlty believe after two centuries people will use the cars more than today, I strongly believe this opinion lacks coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, most cars will be parked after twenty years due to the following reasons and details.
First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that using the after twenty years most people will use public transportation and that can engender a myriad of advanatges. The main reason behind this rationale is that as we can see cities are being more crowded with advent of cars as well the population were increase around large cities such as Newyork. Moreover, the government these days are looking for ways to reduce the crowd and traffic caused by cars and peoples. Therefore, some scientists beleive governments will force people to stop their cars also use the public transporation. To illustrate more thoroughly, my friend Jack he was working In Egypt to a transportaion company in which they are looking to ways to reduct the traffic in Cario. Altough, enhancing the public transportaion such as buses and trains would help, but people sill used their cars even they are getting late to work. However, after 20 years the people believe it would be impractical to use the cars anymore becuase of the traffic and crowds. As a result, cars will parked and public transporation is gonna be used. All in all, we can't and shouldn't overlook the upsides of public transportaion after 20 years.
On top of this, after twenty years the world will be like a village. In the eyes of present day society, after twenty years people will start using internet to work instead of going to the offices. Everything will be done on the internet for instance, contracts, trade, agreements. A great example of this would be my brother Ahmad. he works for a software company and he told me they are working on softwares that called virtuall reality. Furthermore, this software will enable people to dress clothes that they want to buy when they are at homes. Long story short, it's clear as day to me people stop using cars in the future.
In summation, yes, it's virtually impossible to provide a complete satisfying answer to an open-ended question. Altough the jury may be out in this given essay, we can come to mutual agreement that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today due to the following reasons and details mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | King harald | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 63 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 76 | view |
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts a 85
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of |locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 80
- Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees. Through genetic modification, it is possible to create trees that produce more fruits, grow faster, or withstand advers 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...h advent of cars as well the population were increase around large cities such as Ne...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1081, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'park'
Suggestion: park
...ffic and crowds. As a result, cars will parked and public transporation is gonna be us...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1146, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ration is gonna be used. All in all, we cant and shouldnt overlook the upsides of pu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... gonna be used. All in all, we cant and shouldnt overlook the upsides of public transpor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...mple of this would be my brother Ahmad. he works for a software company and he tol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, after all, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83261802575 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55019061214 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515021459227 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2938472194 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.363636364 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95454545455 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319350509284 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957719414124 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916647656575 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210683142518 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407569527926 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.