Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Technology is getting better and better every single day. In fact, Its has made our lives not only advanced but much more easier, particularly in the world of transportation. Eventhough, some people may think that urbinzation has gone so far to the point where it will be no cars in twinty years from now . Personally, I dont agree with fact that people will no longer use cars in two decades from now for two reasons.
First, not all communites are living a fanncy and modern lives. In fact, alot of population are still living in poverty and suffer to get some thing to eat or drink. For example, few days ago I read an article about the communites in Africa and south Asia. The article talks about how do these communites live their lives without a running water. Every day they would walk for hundreds of miles to reach any water resource they can come across to wash their clothes, take a bath and fill out gallons of water to take it back home. Furthermore, the only kind of food that was avaliable for them is fish. Probably you will think fish is enough, who wouldnt like fish?, but did you think about what would they do in Winter ?. Probably not, the article states that, they freeze what they would have fished in the Summer and keep it for the harsh Winter. As you can see, fewer cars in two decades will be extremely impossible.
Second, people will still use cars in the future no matter how advanced they will become. People will not use aircrafts or rockets to get to their five mintues away work-offices or schools. For instance, few years ago, when I was studying space engeering in egypt. I remeber one day one of our associate professors Dr. Ahmas was giving us a lecture about the uses of rockets in two decades from now. He talked about how fast and safe it will be. While he was talking, one of the student raised his hand and asked, "will the rockets be used on earth?". The professor laughed and said,"offcourse not, It is going to be really dangerous". He states that, rockets have been buit on the idea of the lighter the weight the faster the speed, so not so many people can get on board, It is only maximum of ten, and that not only because of the weight but aslo the cost. He said, in the furture eighty percent of the population will be a middle class families, they will not be able to afford the cost. The lecture made me realize in twinty years from now, people will not be so advanced and rich to get rid of using cars.
In sum, I donot think people will stop using cars in the future. Not only because some communties will still live in poverty but also aircarfts and rockets were not built to be on earth. Every one should value the use of cars even in the future.
- TOEFL integrated writing: work a four-day week. 80
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 63
- 128)Some people say that physical exercise should be a required part of every school day. Other people believe that students should spend the whole school day on academic studies. Which opinion do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to suppor 70
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...de our lives not only advanced but much more easier, particularly in the world of transport...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...will be no cars in twinty years from now . Personally, I dont agree with fact that...
^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n twinty years from now . Personally, I dont agree with fact that people will no lon...
^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...ill living in poverty and suffer to get some thing to eat or drink. For example, few days ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'running water'.
Suggestion: running water
...ese communites live their lives without a running water. Every day they would walk for hundreds...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ably you will think fish is enough, who wouldnt like fish?, but did you think about wha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...h?'. The professor laughed and said,'offcourse not, It is going to be really...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 962, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'family'?
Suggestion: family
...f the population will be a middle class families, they will not be able to afford the co...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, really, second, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43227091633 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37155553091 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9764000815 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5769230769 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34615384615 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182750028264 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558375245059 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531509240025 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119658022477 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272790418605 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.