Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that working hours is a controversial subject. While some people prefer to work five days a week to avoid being exhausted by working three days a week in longer hours, I am not convinced by this idea. From my vantage point, it is more enjoyable if people have more days off to spend with their family and do fun things. Furthermore, working in long hours would give the opportunity to not be distracted and continue their work efficiently.
Firstly, people who have the opportunity to work longer during a day, can have more day offs. In other words, their off is extended from 2 days to 4 days. Therefore, they are more prone to use these whole days to have fun and spend time with their family and friends. Moreover, they can conduct some long trips and visit some new locations that they have not seen before. As a result, they are more delightful and feel that they use their time efficiently to do both their works and fun things. On the other hand, working in 5 days a week and 2 days off, merely gives employees the chance to just do the things that they could not do during the week days. Since most of the employees' working hour is until 5 and they have to sleep at 9 in average, these 4 hours is not enough for them to do most of their things. Furthermore, 2 days off is not sufficient to plan an adventurous trip and do fun things.
In addition, working long 3 days a week avoid workers to be distracted by external matters. Indeed, individuals would continue their work efficiently, as they are not concerned that they have to leave their work at 5. For example, some jobs like computer programming needs a lot of focus and concentration. Therefore, as long as programmers develop some thoughts about software, they can effectively develop that software. If the company is closed at 5 pm, programmers need to spend extra time tomorrow morning to continue their thoughts and ideas. Thus, working continuously on some subjects is more beneficial.
To conclude, I believe that as long as individuals could have more days offs to do what makes them happy and continue their works in longer times of the days effectively, they can maintain good feelings toward themselves and they are more pleases. As a result, I strongly support long working hours and more days off.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 86
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage. 83
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64792176039 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64942828413 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442542787286 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.759326468 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.05 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304541376237 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116532011306 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671726048423 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224129719728 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526233548883 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.