Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is beyond doubt that modernism has remarkable influences on people's lives. There is a question which has always brought about heated debate and been a controversial topic referring to whether it is crucial that governments invest on public transportation or to develop the quality of Internet access. The answer is entirely depended on the lens through which one is looking. From my vantage point, the privileges that a sophisticated transportation system can provide substantially outweigh the quality of Internet access. In the following, two reasons will aptly elucidate my standpoint.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that owing an accessible and highly developed transportation system can encourage citizens to not lean on their private cars and consequently it will lead to less air pollution. Since most people are not able to reach their destinations using bus, or subway, they would rather take their own car.
Another noteworthy reason to mention is that transportation is strongly correlated to citizen's quality of living. As people living in large cities spend several hours commuting, they will be more satisfied to sit on comfortable bus chairs and listening to music or reading book instead of driving in jam traffic. Should the government enhance public transportation quality, people will be more fulfilled about their lives. As a results, the tendency to work will also augment. A personal example of mine can shed light to this issue. Since there is no metro station in Iranian national library vicinity, and no other way to get there, I have to take car and unfortunately I have to spend plenty of hours in highway's heavy traffic and tolerating load and unpleasant noises which are able to turn my moments into misery. If there existed a way to not stick in traffic jam and reach where ever we wish effortlessly, living in a city would be much more pleasant.
To bring everything into conclusion, two enumerated reasons converge to the fact that the role that public transportation plays is incomparable with Internet. As it is mentioned hereinabove, not only are general public encouraged to not utilize cars, but also they will be more euphoric about the quality of living in their cities. I would suffice to the above mentioned facts, albeit there are manifold reasons to support my perspective.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 427, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...be more fulfilled about their lives. As a results, the tendency to work will also augment...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 205, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... is mentioned hereinabove, not only are general public encouraged to not utilize cars, but als...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, so, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12176165803 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9178069985 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567357512953 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7546117472 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.294117647 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121311909821 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389699358015 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029849941258 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751406653867 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389289507333 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.