Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is beyond doubt that it is critical for a government to allocate its major funds on ameliorating which aspect of society as far as the development of the nation is concerned. There is a question which has always brought about heated debate and been a controversial topic referring to whether it is crucial that governments invest in public transportation or to develop the quality of Internet access. The answer is entirely depended on the lens through which one is looking. From my vantage point, the privileges that an advanced transportation system can provide substantially outweigh the quality of Internet access. In the following, two reasons will aptly elucidate my standpoint.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that owning an accessible and highly developed transportation system can encourage citizens to not lean on their private cars, and consequently, it will lead to less air pollution. Since most people are not able to reach their destinations using buses or other conveyance facilities, they would rather take their own car that increases fossil fuel consumption.
Another noteworthy reason to mention is that transportation is strongly correlated with the citizen's quality of living. As people living in large cities spend several hours commuting, they will be more satisfied to sit on comfortable bus chairs while listening to music or reading books instead of driving in jam traffic. Should the government enhance public transportation quality, people will be more fulfilled about thier lives. As a result, the tendency to work will also augment. A personal example of mine can shed light to this issue, since there is no metro station in Iranian national library vicinity, and no other way to get there, I have to take my car and unfortunately I have to spend plenty of hours in highway's heavy traffic and tolerating loud and unpleasant noises which have the capability to turn my moments into an authentic misery. If there existed a chance of not sticking in a traffic jam and reach where ever we wish effortlessly, living in a city would be much more delightful.
To bring everything into conclusion, two enumerated reasons converge to the fact that the role that public transportation plays is incomparable with the Internet. As it is stated hereinabove, not only are the general public encouraged not to utilize cars, but also they will be euphoric about the quality of living in their cities. I would suffice to the above-mentioned facts, albeit there are manifold reasons to support my perspective.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 798, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oud and unpleasant noises which have the capability to turn my moments into an au...
^^
Line 9, column 210, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...is stated hereinabove, not only are the general public encouraged not to utilize cars, but als...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, so, then, while, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10739856802 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97980512035 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563245823389 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2142772351 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1875 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128602298848 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430820522169 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291514757884 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076437565099 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385875129639 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.