The lecturer disputes the idea that working four days a week in stead of five days is beneficial to the economy and may increase companies profits. He asserts that there are a couple of drawbacks caused by the shortening the number of working days, so he refutes his claims.
First, the lecturer argues that there are other hidden costs after hiring more employees in spite of paying the same amount of wages . The author claims that companies would benefit from having employees working four days instead of five days because workers become more alert and they can avoid mistakes at work. However, the lecturer states that having more employees means that there is a need for more office space. Beside, the bills of medical insurance would also be higher.Thus the total companies spending's will increase.
Second, the lecturer contends that implementing a four days working schedule policy does not necessarily creates more jobs. He says that companies would require their employees to work overtime to compensate for the shortage of employees and will raise their expectations about productivity. Thus,economically speaking, this policy will not create more jobs and reduce the unemployment rates
Finally, the lecturer argues that employees will not have a better quality of life. He asserts that it is true that working four days a week instead of five will give employees more time to do their leisure activities. However, at the same time, it may stop their chances of being promoted to a better position. Moreover, such policy would not only result in hindering employee's promotion, but would also cause them to lose their jobs if companies decides to down size because of poor economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
... the idea that working four days a week in stead of five days is beneficial to the economy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...spite of paying the same amount of wages . The author claims that companies would ...
^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...r, the lecturer states that having more employees means that there is a need for more off...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
... medical insurance would also be higher.Thus the total companies spendings will incr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... medical insurance would also be higher.Thus the total companies spendings will incr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...ng schedule policy does not necessarily creates more jobs. He says that companies would...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , economically
...ir expectations about productivity. Thus,economically speaking, this policy will not create m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...licy would not only result in hindering employees promotion, but would also cause them to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12230215827 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57640531837 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543165467626 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3667398462 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529629086381 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191236423589 0.0996497079465 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956036759528 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329882587642 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101299521399 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.