Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Throughout history, examining other planets and traveling in space has long been a dream for people due to the fact that space exploration requires much money. Whether government need more information about space and solar system it should expend much money and time for it is crucial or not has generated a lot of controversy lately. I firmly assert that, space exploration is a waste of money and the government not only should spend more funds for accessing to high-technology in the universities but also improving transportation is necessary. For further clarification, I will elaborate my idea with some significant reasons in the following paragraphs.
One of the meaningful reasons coming to my mind at first is that traveling in space is not a fundamental issue when universities need more funds for increasing their equipment in academic condition. As a matter of fact, the government have (has) to investigate and include a lot(lot of) investments to solve some problems related to the educational institutes such as high-schools and universities where ask money for improving and intensifying laboratory’s equipment, library’s books, and Internet site. An example can illuminate this claim, during my university, I searched on the internet for my thesis but I could not find journals with high-level, which connected to my major, since the internet was extremely low speed. Not only was our library empty of useful books, but also the laboratory did not completed for more projects perfectly. The more we have tools and facilities, the more we obtain achievements and attainments. Thus, universities’ needs are the remarkable subject which a government should consider and spend money on it.
Another equally remarkable reason is that exploring in space is a type of wasting money since public transportation needs more money for enhancing routes, highways, and clean fuel. Furthermore, if the government does not pay attention to intensify the cities cars and automobiles, it will witness of air, water, and noise pollution, which is horrible for a societies health and future. Needless to say, countries where already have had elemental requirements they should not have supported unnecessary research such as space travel. As an example, in our city there are (is) a great deal of old and irregular buses, which they related to several years, now they work and release a lot dangerous and toxic contaminations. Then, the government’s duty is save and get much fund to remove these harmful circumstances. Accordingly, expending budgets is basically for transportation.
As a result, I strongly believe that the government does not waste money for space discover, because universities require modern tools and there are more problems related to transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-03 | zari1991 | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | ashkar | view | |
| 2018-09-18 | Fateme_mhd | 90 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | daisenryaku | 90 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | NGN | 90 | view |
- TPO34 76
- TPO34 73
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past becausethey spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networkingWeb site.Use specific reasons and examples to 76
- TPO43 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 813, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'complete'
Suggestion: complete
... books, but also the laboratory did not completed for more projects perfectly. The more w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...does not pay attention to intensify the cities cars and automobiles, it will witness o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...oise pollution, which is horrible for a societies health and future. Needless to say, cou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, thus, as to, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37671232877 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28505810027 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545662100457 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2127125601 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.529411765 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7647058824 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27890248864 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920521394144 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559851105634 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188835101319 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478885725892 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.