Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.
People in the today’s world have become too dependent on automobiles.
In today’s modern life, thanks to the technological breacktroghts in every section of science, the way of our life has altered dramatically. some people are of the opinion that the technologhy affect consumerism, hence more dependent on them, while others believe that people just adapted with technology and it does not mean dependency. I personaly subscribe to the view that we do not dependent on autimobiles as a sample of advanced technology for two main reasons. In the following paragraphs my reasons will be elaborated on in more detail.
To bigan with, I could not denay the fact that in today’s world, taransportations has modified, contributing to overpopulations. Genarally speaking, one of the most saleant factors of today’s life is increasing the usage of automobiles. However, using more cars do not indicate dependency to them. it means that societies are rised by their demands and using more car does not depart from the needs. As a case in point, in populated cities these days, just as automobiles are too much in the streets, so are publice transportation crowded too. Tokyio for instance, has such a incredible traffic over 24 hours per a day; on the other hand, their subway is crowded too. Threre for, the more population the more automobiles; therefore, dependency is not a reason for car’s consumerism.
Secondly, in the past time, wealthy people utilized hourses or vagons instead of cars. In face, with the advent of cars to the world, it took place of other vehicles; nevertheless, average people could not efford for fancy appliances. Nowadays, as the same as the past, wealthy people have their vehicles. As a matter of fact, In my opinion, it does not change anything than the past. On the other poinst of view, leading to pollution and global warming, residents tend to use less cars to have healthy weather for their future generations. For example, reacently I have read a article about Sidny, in which is controled their arriosen of dangers gas pullption such as carbon dioxid, green houses gas, and other sorces of gas by decreasing of automobile usage.
Drawing upon the resons what I mentioned above, although there are always some exceptions excluded from general ruls, I believe that not only people do not rely on their cars these days, but also veriety of societis attempt to reduce air pollution by decreasing usage of automobiles, although overpopulation put every afforts in different perspective.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 94
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 50
- Some people prefer to take small classes fewer students such as the professors can remember student s names Others like big classes lots of students which one do you prefer 76
- TPO36Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, 3
- TPO 53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...y of our life has altered dramatically. some people are of the opinion that the tech...
^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ars do not indicate dependency to them. it means that societies are rised by their...
^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...wded too. Tokyio for instance, has such a incredible traffic over 24 hours per a ...
^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'incredible traffic'.
Suggestion: incredible traffic
...wded too. Tokyio for instance, has such a incredible traffic over 24 hours per a day; on the other h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...os;s consumerism. Secondly, in the past time, wealthy people utilized hourses or vag...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 478, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d global warming, residents tend to use less cars to have healthy weather for their ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 577, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ons. For example, reacently I have read a article about Sidny, in which is contro...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13861386139 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98279959471 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581683168317 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3430106472 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232338119558 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692530071837 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444895213346 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12812355827 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522620805113 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.