Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of teachers' importance engendered copious controversies among people. Some people may hold the view that teacher were more valued by society in the past. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that teacher have better place and in society today. As far as I am concerned, teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past. In the following paragraph, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason worth mentioning is that teachers help society to progress. Nowadays, the development in the technology happening at a very fast pace and the advancement are because of past teacher. They convey their knowledge to students and motivate children to study and after many years this students help technology to enhance and this leads to improve people's lifestyle. Therefore, they have undeniable role on this situation and every society knows it and appreciated them. Moreover, number of teacher was very low. For example, number of teachers was very low and it was possible to appreciated them but now it is impossible for societies to appreciated all teacher because the number of them are very high.
A further more subtle to point out is that teachers were more knowledgeable. There were no facilities in past student only have one teacher in all lessons. Hence, teachers have a vast general knowledge and In these days, teacher are well educated in one area. For instance, when my father was a student, his teacher have a general knowledge in math or physics and learn these subjects by himself and we can understand that how teacher try hard to learn this areas and it was their rights to be appreciated by society. Also, teacher do not spend much time for their student today because the condition of living is very arduous and teachers need another job to live easily and without financial problem. However, in the past teachers have the same situation but they spend much more time for their students. For example, my father always helps my sister to solve her problem and her teacher never answer question in a class.
To make a long story short, based on aforementioned argument, teachers were more appreciated by communities in past. Consequently, it is highly recommended that the public give more value to teachers because of their momentous work and inspire them to teach better.
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 60
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 71
- TPO 54 80
- TPO 69 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'general knowledge'.
Suggestion: general knowledge
... father was a student, his teacher have a general knowledge in math or physics and learn these subj...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tand that how teacher try hard to learn this areas and it was their rights to be app...
^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...rs were more appreciated by communities in past. Consequently, it is highly recommended...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0175 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6921169644 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5175 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6925296197 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.35 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273364745483 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104267264925 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809783189609 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186914437531 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434104835299 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.