Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
After parents, teachers play an import role in our lives since we spend long hours with them in schools and universities. They should be highly respected because they dedicate their time to teach us new things. Some people hold the opinion that nowadays, teachers are less appreciated by society than in the past and I concur with this idea. In the ensuing lines, I will explain two reasons to substantiate my response.
First, teachers are being paid less than the past, therefore, they are not in a high social position. Needless to say that these days people tend to appreciate powerful and wealthy people. Unfortunately, teachers, at least in my country earn less than average level and they are not in a good financial condition. People are aware of this issue and it unconsciously leads them to think less of teachers. Take a 14-year-old girl whose parents are teachers, on the other hand, her classmate whose parents are doctors. She dresses well and has a fancy life. As a result, this girl thinks being a teacher is not a proper job because her parents cannot prove her well so she takes teaching as a low-level job.
Second, the number of teachers is more than in the last decades; therefore, it is not a special job anymore. Rarely were people literate in the past and a few numbers of them had a chance to teach so teaching was a well-respected job. The more people see something the more it becomes routine for them. Most of the people are educated now so they are aware they can be a teacher easily but they want something more because they count these jobs as a mundane one. People respect individuals with a cool job like being an astronaut, business manager, lawyer, etc. For instance, many of my uncles, aunts, and cousins are teachers and I believe it is a common job so everybody can have it, therefore, it is not a valuable job to me.
In conclusion, according to the aforementioned explanations and examples, I believe teachers are less appreciated that the past because they make a few amounts of money so they are in lower social position and the number of teachers is increasing, hence, teaching does not count as a special job to be highly respected and valued. I wish governments do something for this job because teachers work hard but they do not receive as much respect and attention they deserve.
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
- Nowadays, children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smartphone, video games, for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children's development. 76
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'Rarely' is usually put after the verb 'were'.
Suggestion: Were Rarely
...efore, it is not a special job anymore. Rarely were people literate in the past and a few n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...it is not a special job anymore. Rarely were people literate in the past and a few n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69512195122 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65612443714 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50487804878 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3268562556 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.315789474 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198767606927 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648786954924 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540386689525 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134445157462 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434864939664 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.