Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

范文
关闭
  Within recent 30 years, our society has witnessed and experienced radical changes in each and every aspect of our life. Under this circumstance, young people are also faced with a wide range of temptations and impacts brought by various objects, from fancy entertainment gadgets, to online pornography and to subversive conception, which is why there are many rules nowadays for youngsters to follow and obey to insulate them from juvenile delinquency. However, some people may wonder whether some of these rules are too strict and serious and whether they should make a compromise. As far as I'm concerned, some rules may be too much and even may do harm to their natural development.

  First, some parents may order their children to devote most of their time to study and prevent them from any access to leisure and entertainment. Frequently, parents would have unreasonable expectations of their kids, hoping that they could show an outstanding performance in their school, be admitted into a top-rank university and own a decent career right after graduation. Because of these expectations, they would set a limit on hours on which children could spend watching television and even register for all kinds of extra curriculums to make their children more competent than their peers. But this teaching method will be very detrimental to their beloved sweethearts in that young children's instinct prefers relaxing and exciting games and entertainment to tiring and killing studies and assignments. In the long run, it is likely to turn a kid into a dumb nerd, who has no idea of how to relax and enjoy each moment of life. What's the point of forging a child into an outstanding individual while he loses the fun and joy of life forever and ever?

  Second, some parents are likely to forbid their children from puppy love or any form of intimate relationships they may establish with someone they like. Some parents may be afraid that falling into an early-stage romantic relation could be a distraction for their innocent kids, for which they may skip their regular classes to date or even earn a bad grades in their mid-term or final exams. Due to these fears and worries, parents usually curb any of their children's close connection with a boy or a girl in the cradle.

  Nevertheless, this is unhealthy to a child's mental development because owning a longtime and steady relationship is an indispensable component in people's life. If children have never had any experience of dealing with the person they have a crush on, they are likely to be sensitive to the other's emotional reaction, thus being emotionally vulnerable when they become an adult. In another word, isolating children from any access to any romantic relationship is too severe for them to follow.

  Admittedly, rules sometimes are necessary because they could do good to children's self-discipline and future development. For instance, too much entertainment and leisure could cause a child to indulge himself in it and get addicted; falling in love with another person and thus forming an unhealthy obsession could cost a young child too much and take him a long time to recover. All these incidents just show the necessity of rules and disciplines. But leaving children no time for fun and relaxation is too absolute, arbitrary and even devastating and we should make every effort to stop extremes from happening. In a nutshell, we should avoid those too strict rules and guide our children in a healthy and sustainable way.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1970s'.
Suggestion: In the 1970s
...sured. Go back to the example of China. In 1970s, a great number of laws are badly estab...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, while, as for, for example, as a result, as well as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 15.1003584229 232% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2642.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 543.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86556169429 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67323524819 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502762430939 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4821024002 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.090909091 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6818181818 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203125930405 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642882880257 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523385393345 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129161712651 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556453928768 0.0645574589148 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.