TPO 55-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

TPO 55-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by farhadk on Fri, 01/03/2020 - 07:55

During the last decades, with the development of the internet and its services, there been a heated controversy between pedagogical experts regarding the influences of the internet on students. A question, which is a matter of debate, is, whether communicating via e-mail between students to do a project is better than communicating in person. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to a great extent, on the belief that face to face communication for students is better than online communication in order to do their projects. The following paragraphs elaborate on the thesis.

To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justifies the thesis is that face to face communication is more effective on students. To put it in general words, communicating in person, students engage in the project completely. Simply stated, students, talk about with each other and discuss about the project orally that result in doing the project well. To shed more light on the issue, according to the result of the study posted on Times Magazine, students who do their project with face to face communication are more successful than who communicate with each other via e-mail.

alongside the first reason elaborated above, the fact that doing the project with face to face communication can increase the accuracy is another point which requires a meticulous attention. In other words, when students spend some hours to do their project and discuss with each other orally, they find their mistakes and solve them immediately. Thus, the accuracy will improve and the project would be well finished as fast as possible and it does not need to spend more time to revise the project.However, what I mentioned above might not be overgeneralized to all contexts. There are some students who do the projects better when they are alone. Nevertheless, there are more of an exception rather than a general rule.

All in all, although there are always some exceptions that are excluded from the general rule, I do agree with the face to face communication. To recapitulate, it not only have more positive effects on the project but also can improve its accuracy.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-03 farhadk 71 view
2020-01-02 mobinzaarreh 73 view
2020-01-02 saeide 90 view
2020-01-01 amir_rf 76 view
2019-12-20 nusybah 60 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user farhadk :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... communication are more successful than who communicate with each other via e-mail....
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Alongside
...mmunicate with each other via e-mail. alongside the first reason elaborated above, the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...o spend more time to revise the project.However, what I mentioned above might not be ov...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some students who do the projects better when they are alone. Nevertheless, there...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, in general, in other words, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04155124654 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.921396409 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484764542936 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2976218168 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261157598838 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100142883558 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062735230558 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165334100441 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04986324813 0.0645574589148 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.