Without a shadow of a doubt, humanitarian activities are of the essence, especially when it comes to this hectic and suffering world. An unanswered question in this area is that how university clubs can alleviate these significant social problems. However, some arguments asserting the most influential impact of students on neighborhood areas is collecting financial donations for homeless people. I believe otherwise, maintaining club members should make a plan to visit elderly persons regularly. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that few people are concerned about the loneliness of elderly individuals. Annually, numerous older adults die in their apartments alone, and neither government nor other private organizations care about them. However, it is not required to allocate a considerable budget for improving their life. Consequently, students can play a pivotal role in this matter and positively affects their welfare and mental health. For instance, volunteer students can share their time to discuss with these socially isolated persons and helping mitigate their depression thoughts. Furthermore, medical students joining these clubs can check their health regularly or ensure they their medicine promptly. Therefore, volunteer visiting is a practical and straightforward way for students to influence their society.
Another motive to be mentioned is that having interaction with older people can be informative for young persons. These people have accumulated valuable knowledge and experiences during their life that young students cannot readily achieve. Although most people think this information is unsuitable for the current circumstance, evidence and observation revealed otherwise. To put this in a vivid picture, if students are familiar with their level of energy and enthusiasm drop as time elapsed and they enter in elderly age, they will understand the value of juvenile. Another implication of participating in these programs is they build a strong relationship with their family and friends and not letting simple tension break their friendship. For example, had I not visited a retirement home last year, I would not have comprehended the importance of family communication.
Reflecting upon the grounds mentioned above, one soon realizes that engagement students clubs in older people visiting is beneficial not only for their community but also for them.
- After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 Watch the recording by yourself 2 Invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions 85
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors fields of study which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice and why A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner so that 86
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise Explain your answer with examples and specific reasons 76
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics help people who cannot afford to build or rent 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71808510638 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02447294961 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619680851064 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0251173453 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.157894737 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180776253443 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525397943114 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03881695381 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10934269699 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232979019137 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71808510638 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02447294961 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619680851064 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0251173453 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.157894737 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180776253443 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525397943114 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03881695381 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10934269699 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232979019137 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.