Undoubtedly, education methods play a vital role in students’ academic performance. In this regard, mentors have been examining various approaches to enhance teaching efficiency, ranging from implementing technology to describing applications and practical issues to interest their students. As for the writer’s perspective, I firmly believe educators can make students more enthusiastic by connecting theoretical concepts to real-world applications. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The first and paramount reason is that teaching only theoretical subjects like mathematical is monotonous. One of the most challenging problems educators face in theory-based courses is creating motivation for students to participate in classroom discussions. Students think neither do these courses add value to them nor be useful in their future life. These thoughts give rise to raise the level of difficulty for both instructors and learners. Accordingly, teachers must describe the usage of theoretical knowledge in real-world exercises. Students take part in classes eagerly and share their ideas about lectures. Furthermore, they would research others’ applications and present them in class. For example, if not for explaining the practical side of physics, I would not select aerospace engineering as my major.
The second reason is that real-life examples provide an opportunity to surmount contemporary problems. Throughout history, the development of science and theories has resulted from seeking to understand their nature. Scientists and researchers proposed their hypotheses based on their observations and conducted experiments to test them. By describing the background of lessons, teachers can interest their students to challenge them. As a result, they promote scientific thinking in their class and improve students’ comprehension. They pave the way for further improvement of current issues. For instance, had professors not mentioned the imperfection of old classical theories to apply to novel materials, they would not have been used in new airplanes.
To sum up, all reasons mentioned above lead us to conclude teachers can stimulate a passion for learning by linking actual practices to their lectures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lect aerospace engineering as my major. The second reason is that real-life exam...
^^^
Line 4, column 758, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld not have been used in new airplanes. To sum up, all reasons mentioned above l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, as for, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93051359517 4.8611393121 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23280909792 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646525679758 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1523825651 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.15 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.55 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219083855551 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588242514784 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521730405554 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11774784959 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474633504683 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 10.9000537634 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.01818996416 130% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.