When it come to a complex problem, the debate over whether people should figure out on their owm rather than ask others for help is still fierce. Some may suggest that other our experience and expertise are only things that are trustable. However, I hold this view differently. People should to ask other people for help when facing a tough problem.
To begin with, other people can help you aviod extra stress. When people conflict troublesome, there is no more efficient approach to deal with them than ask others for advice. Imagine that a person need to pruchase a shoes form countless avaliable choices. In this case, they may easily be overwhlemed by decision fatigue even before they start to think about it. On the other hand, asking others for help can considerably ruduce abovementioned fatigue and enable us to figure out problems rationally and efficiently. According to a recent study conducted by Harvard University, researchers have shown that up to fifty-eight percents of interviewees expressed that they performed poorly when they were facing decision fatigues, which may in turn cause terrible performance and result.
Moreover, keeping open mind to others can help us learn a lot. Nowadays, people tend to isolate in their small ivory towers, and they need others to provoke them. People surroudning us can provides us with a comprehensive and objective understanding about ourselves. For example, it would be impossible for Scottie Pipen and Dennis Rodman to become on of the most influence NBA superstars if they did not accept their teammate Micheal Jordan's help about thier shooting form. Similarly, it is also hard to imagine that Crasidiano Ronaldo become worldwide fame for his puzzling footwork and scoring if he did not comply his coach's advice when he was in Menchesit City.
In a nutshell, asking others for help is undoubtedly a wiser choice for the reasons discussed above.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
When it come to a complex problem, the debate over w...
^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...hers for help is still fierce. Some may suggest that other our experience and expertise...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...provoke them. People surroudning us can provides us with a comprehensive and objective u...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...ottie Pipen and Dennis Rodman to become on of the most influence NBA superstars if...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11501597444 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69530431553 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8430114797 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0625 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19255335425 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691445151405 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626956274826 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13710132125 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437412304181 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
When it come to a complex problem, the debate over w...
^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...hers for help is still fierce. Some may suggest that other our experience and expertise...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...provoke them. People surroudning us can provides us with a comprehensive and objective u...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...ottie Pipen and Dennis Rodman to become on of the most influence NBA superstars if...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11501597444 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69530431553 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8430114797 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0625 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19255335425 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691445151405 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626956274826 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13710132125 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437412304181 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.