When coming to making a huge purchase, the debate over which factors affect people’s decisions more significantly is still fierce. Information from the media, salespeople’s advice, our own judgment, and recommendations from surrounding people are four common options that influence our decision. The first three indeed have their own advantages, but they are pale when compared with advice from our friends and colleagues.
To begin with, our friends and coworkers are more like to provide us with some helpful information sincerely. We are familiar with each other and know their strengths and hobbies. In that case, we can obtain certain information from the field they are interested in. Use my personal experience as an example. I used to buy a pair of Bluetooth speakers to play some music during my trip. I asked one of my colleagues, a technology enthusiast, for help. He recommended me a pair of speakers that have a reasonable price and reminded me that they show poor performance in high volume due to the limited output power of the USB port. As I only use it on trips, it is an acceptable option considering the reasonable price. There is no more efficient approach to making a purchase decision than listening to advice for our surrounding people.
When we face a considerable purchase, we may feel anxious since there are so many potential choices that it is hard to decide on our own. These kinds of things can exhaust us even before we make a decision. Therefore, we tend to ask for support from other people because they do not undergo the same pressure we experience, which helps them make a more rational decision. Nevertheless, some salespeople in the store may make use of that anxiety to recommend something rip-off since their salary is based on their sales, which encourages them to provide some expensive items. As for checking information from the media, we may quickly be buried among countless reviews posted by others, which further hinders us from making a rational purchase.
In a nutshell, information from our surrounding people undoubtedly has the greatest influence for the reasons discussed above.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05649717514 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88805165302 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573446327684 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4923699937 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227611116762 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682569687091 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070014298453 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153414367871 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874038897009 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05649717514 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88805165302 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573446327684 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4923699937 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227611116762 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682569687091 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070014298453 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153414367871 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874038897009 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.