Do you agree or disagree? People meet many problems in their daily life and they can solve them by themselves or with the help of their families, so the help from the government is not necessary.
In the modern era, life's problems have played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, many people have always searched for ways to increase the problem of their life. Regardless or not humankind needs a government to solve problems alongside their family and themselves is controversial. I content that governments are responsible for solving people's problems. So, I do not agree with this proposal. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mentioned is that the government must pay some money for making some facilities in a city. To elaborate on my point, people need to spend times in a place like parks, green space and many other places like this for reducing stress and change their mood. So, these places help people to reduce their anxiety so that they can better face their problem. Furthermore, individuals need some proper place for doing sports. Hence, the government must be building some gyms for people. Consider a woman who has a hard disease like blood pressure, for instance. She has problem with her health, and she and family members try to solve this disease. In this situation, she needs someplace for doing some regular sports until she would control her disease. Therefore, the government must proper someplace for people like this woman.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the government must pay a lot of money for drug and curing disease. To shed more light on this matter, in the modern era, people face several dangerous diseases like cancer, and they need a lot of money for curing these diseases. In this situation, most people do not have enough money for facing and treating this disease so that they need the government's help. The government should pay part of their cost. Also, the government should better pay part of some drugs cost. Furthermore, the government can prevent some disease. For example, they can encourage people to use organic materials and component. Besides, the government can allocate some part of budge for cultivating organic and healthy food and vegetable. It helps people to become healthy people and prevent hard disease.
All in all, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that people need the government to solve their problem. I believe that the government not only making some facilities for people to better face their problem but also paying some money for preventing the human's problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | zari1991 | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | Romina_stb | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | mahi22 | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-25 | zabanenglish | 70 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | elham.u3 | 73 | view |
- TOEFL T P O 34 - Integrated Writing Task 78
- Do you agree or disagree? If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In order to stay healthy, many people choose to exercise. Some people tend to exercise individually such as running and riding bicycles, etc. Some people tend to participate in group exercises such as team sports. Which one do you prefer and why? 66
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07971014493 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58979217335 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468599033816 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4438676146 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8846153846 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279521015688 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961991919039 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797331329748 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206861160899 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532349067295 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.