Do you agree or disagree with the statement: competition with friends usually has negative effects on friendships?
Nowadays, competition among friends has become the top concern in society. In many people's opinion, those competitions affect friendships negatively because only one person can win at last, which hurts their relationship a lot. Contrary to those people's idea is my perspective that competition with friends usually has positive effects on friendships. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the following part.
What must be prioritized is that competitions, such as football matches and video games, make it possible for people to spend more time and have more fun with friends, which can strengthen their friendship. In detail, nowadays people are facing fierce competition at work and in schools, which places them under great pressure. Under such circumstances, people will spend less time with their friends and even lose them. There is no denying that holding some competitions between friends helps them relax, thus reducing their pressure, but also increasing the time they spend together, which will improve their relationship. For example, during my break time last week, I played basketball with my best friend Joey, who I had not talked to for a long time due to busy schoolwork. I communicated a lot with him during the process, and our relationship became closer. Therefore, I believe that competition with friends usually has positive effects on friendships.
What is equally important is that competitions with friends provide people with opportunities to achieve their goals together, which brings benefits to both of them, thus cementing their friendship. In detail, peer pressure from friends stimulates people to show their best performance, which helps them reach their goals more quickly. This reminds me of the story between my best friend Tom and me. Last year, both Tom and I successfully organized an auction during a P&G recruitment interview, which we only had 40 hours to prepare. Since we were in the same group, the peer pressure pushed both of us to try our best to design a strategy to make the auction items appreciate and develop a negotiating plan with the sponsors. Finally, both of us were highly recognized by the superior and transferred to formal employees. Thus, I reckon that competition with friends usually has positive effects on friendships.
In conclusion, I strongly think that competition with friends usually has positive effects on friendships because people can spend more time with friends and because competitions can help people achieve success together.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-23 | xinxindiandeng | 64 | view |
2022-03-22 | xinxindiandeng | 70 | view |
2022-03-22 | xinxindiandeng | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement competition with friends usually has negative effects on friendships 70
- Do you agree or disagree it is a waste of money for a government to fund space travel 76
- Do you agree or disagree it is a waste of money for a government to fund space travel 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement competition with friends usually has negative effects on friendships 70
- Young people today are more likely to give time and effort to improve the world than young people were in the past 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, i reckon, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26732673267 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85986547006 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522277227723 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7377053671 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307074318971 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121163068893 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117551881432 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237709991578 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432398458197 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, i reckon, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26732673267 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85986547006 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522277227723 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7377053671 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307074318971 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121163068893 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117551881432 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237709991578 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432398458197 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.