Do you agree or disagree with the statement: It is better to finish a project completely and then do another project than do two or more projects at the same time.
When things come to work, people are tend to emphasize on efficiency. Therefore, many people believe that it’s better to deal with two or more projects at the same time in order to finish tasks faster. However, others including me suggest that we should focus on one thing instead of more, because of joy of concentration, contemplation and high quality.
To start with, picking one most important project and putting others aside allows people to concentrate more easily. The concentration can render a tedious task more interesting. For example, when I was assigned a poster about suffrage in Canada, I forced myself to forget about math homework and searched online without my mother language. When I read a few passages about the person’s case, I vividly envisioned Emily Murphy, a strong women who bravely opposed the world dominated by the male. It evoked my reverence toward her and pride of being a women.
Secondly, dealing with each project separately provides people a better way of pondering. It’s no less than struggling to care about several projects simultaneously. As your thought is jumping between projects, irrelevant problems pops off concurrently which can disturb the most valuable idea from being conceived. Thus, it is better to embark on a new project after the current one is fulfilled.
Lastly, what ensures a better project is the idea of finishing one before starting another. Handling different projects needs unparalleled effort to keep everything in mind. In contrast, it’s easy to attend to one of them and considerate the details prudently. For example, last Saturday, I tried to write essays with various topics in one day. Surprisingly, it turned out that some of them share similar train of thought and most of them have structural features in common. Confusing distinctive projects together is not a good idea of perfection.
Generally speaking, completing one project at a time serves as a better choice, because it’s easier for people to concentrate, think clearly and do a better job, which eventually turn into satisfactory outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | HHH321 | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | HHH321 | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-10 | Petros Tepoyan | 63 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | Angelina2016 | 90 | view |
| 2018-11-08 | Pinn | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we should focus on one thing instead of more, because of joy of concentration, c...
^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...vidly envisioned Emily Murphy, a strong women who bravely opposed the world dominated...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...reverence toward her and pride of being a women. Secondly, dealing with each project...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...verence toward her and pride of being a women. Secondly, dealing with each project...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in contrast, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27596439169 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89904752871 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643916913947 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.994623655914 402% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6758364794 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5789473684 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284379722068 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795999952549 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087041954094 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156682405546 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575111814104 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.