As our world becomes more and more international and has more methods to produce products, there is a wide range of products for us to choose from. As far as I am concerned, the incentive for people to buy products is undoubtedly based on their real needs.
Firstly, physiological needs serve as a key driver for people to obtain the necessities. By that I mean, based on one of the most reputed psychological theories (i.e. the Hierarchy of Needs proposed by Maslow), we can clearly see that physiological needs (i.e. food, clothes, and shelter) and safety needs are the basic needs of a person. Usually, these needs energize people to purchase various kinds of necessities (i.e. rice, oil, and salt) to satisfy the fundamental demand. By doing so, people can keep themselves alive and live a normal life. Lack of these necessities, namely the bedrock of daily life, is likely to threaten people's survival, not to mention study and work. Therefore, the necessities play an integral role in people's daily life; whether others have them or not will not sway one's buying decisions.
Apart from physiological needs, psychological needs also contribute to the purchase of products, especially luxuries. Some may argue that consumers may buy things not because of their real needs but based on vanity and jealousy. However, there is a critical factor that goes unnoticed: certain luxurious products do fulfill the need of being recognized and accepted by others. Such psychological needs prove to be decisive in purchasing decisions. For instance, a lot of entrepreneurs will meet on formal occasions. Attending such important events, they choose to present positive images with the help of expensive clothes and designer handbags. In this process, expensive clothes are status symbols, enabling people to gain a sense of self-satisfaction and belonging. Overall, people’s purchase of such products can be justifiable.
In conclusion, it is my conviction that the reason why people buy products is undoubtedly based on their real demands.
- Social media is the best way to express personal views 80
- Many people value long lasting friendships Which ONE of the following qualities do you think is most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time Why They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and TV programs made in one s own country are more interesting than those made in other countries 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to spend money on traveling and vacation than save money for the future 73
- Nowadays many job interviewers and employers are looking for various additional sources of information to better understand a job application Which is the best way for the employers to better know the situation of a job application Contacting previous emp 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "Needs proposed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'proposing' or 'to be proposed'.
Suggestion: proposing; to be proposed
...al theories i.e. the Hierarchy of Needs proposed by Maslow, we can clearly see that phys...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...products, especially luxuries. Some may argue that consumers may buy things not becau...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, i mean, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25304878049 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9654448907 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588414634146 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1070476311 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.352941176 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28592615721 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812802638061 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469841192623 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15024395529 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050251024134 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.