Do you prefer watching TV programs for knowledge or just for entertainment?
it is obvious that the Medea plays a pivotal role in our daily life, and tv programs are the most prevalent kind of it. Although some people might adhere to the idea that is it a logical chioce to follow and watch educational programs on tv, others possess the conviction that having fun via watching them is a better idea. As far as I am concerned, I would rather to choose those ones with useful knowldege-improving content. I will develop my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
To beging with, one should take into account that tv programs are free sources of information, and watching such programs not only develop my knowledge about areas that I am familiar with, but also introduce many new subjects that I can learn about. it is a commonly held belief that for getting skilled in different areas, people should spend a lot of money these days. By watching educational tv programs, that amount of money could be saved, and be spent on other beneficial activities. For instance, back to the time I was working on my thesis, I happened to watch a scientific tv series which introduced me to a higher level of my expertise. Therefore, I started to do more research about it and exercise those techniques in my work.
The other noteworthy reason that should be mentioned is that since knowledge-based programs are designed on a rational basis, they could help me to improve my creativity. Moreover, because those tv programs teach items to step by step, they help the mind to connect the dots, enhance the approach of thinking, and as a result, being better in developing innovative ideas. For example, a cooking program indicates what is main material for cooking a special dish, and at the same time, gives the idea how to use my instinct to make a more delicious meal as well.
To wrap ut up, I am of the opinion that it is good to watch programs on tv which have the perspective of knowledge because they are economically reasonable, and make our minds to perform in a more creative way. it cannot be denied that entertainment shows and programs are more fun to watch, but is it not better to spend your time learning a thing from tv instead of wasting time on soap operas?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is obvious that the Medea plays a pivot...
^^
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
... am concerned, I would rather to choose those ones with useful knowldege-improving content...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ny new subjects that I can learn about. it is a commonly held belief that for gett...
^^
Line 13, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...inds to perform in a more creative way. it cannot be denied that entertainment sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67010309278 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75599714197 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551546391753 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8256663035 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285500291049 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863050545545 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476446626203 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168575618324 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364932032819 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.