education of young children or universities
When considering at factors contributing to successful development of a country, there are various angles to look from. Moreover, there are numerous attributes that differ from one country to another, and thus effective paths to develop a country and guide its generation to flourish cannot be generalized to all countries. All that said, I believe that it is more essential for a government to spend money on education of younger children rather than universities. I will demonstrate my ideas further as follows.
Firstly, most of person's personality and characteristics are formed in very young ages. How a citizen conducts their social responsibilites and palys their role in the community reflects how they were raised and educated in young age. Let us consider a child that learns about sympathy and respect to others with interactive informative activities in school and compare them to another child who has experienced neglect and inconsiderations in school due to crowded classrooms, low budget, and inadequate facilities. I believe that the road is paved for the former to be a great member of the society and contribute to its development.
Secondly, all the members of a society do not attend a university while education of young children is mandatory in many countries and in other countries, it is not not very probable for a young child to not receive education of any sort. Collectively, when focused on the advancement of young children's education, we are faced with a greater target population. Thus, the progress might have more influential impact on a society as hole. For example, teaching young children in schools about the adverse effects of smoking can be subsequently more beneficial than teaching university students about the topic, on the basis that we have a bigger audience in the former situation.
In conclusion, promoting the education quality of young children can be more effective than focusing on universities. The reasons supporting my idea are that young children are at the begining of developing their personalitiest, and therefore are more teachable. On the other hand, although not everyone in a community attend a university, most of a country's population do receive some of kind a primary education at young ages.
- fake coin or real coin 80
- powered flight by ptesaurs 81
- TPO 41 independent agree or not teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 90
- TPO 47 integrated pterosaurs could not fly because they were so big could not take off from ground and cold blooded 80
- greeks burning mirror 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the persons') or simply say ''most persons''.
Suggestion: most of the persons; most persons
...y ideas further as follows. Firstly, most of persons personality and characteristics are for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...countries and in other countries, it is not not very probable for a young child to not ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23626373626 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13214284509 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541208791209 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3665176221 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.066666667 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373673574405 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114953588624 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121504669094 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22144052188 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139108799276 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.