Essay topics: TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task
There's no doubt that workers worldwide prefer being hired in jobs which consist of different types of activities. That may be because, as human beings, we have so many capabilities we can utilize and ignoring some of them might result in dissatisfaction.
To commence, doing different tasks needs several parts of our brain active. If we do one task for a long day, then after at most two hours, we will become unproductive, since a specific part in our brain is bored. In contrast, if we switch between various tasks, our brain activity will be distributed among different parts and as a result, we will be more productive. This explains why workers are more satisfied with multi-task jobs.
Secondly, people who have several things in hand stay much more motivated than those who continue one task for a long time. Although focusing on a specific task may seem to have better achievements, it causes fatigue and tiredness which makes a worker describe his job as unsatisfactory. For example, due to my personal experiences, I change the subject of the material I'm studying regularly during a day, so that I feel more motivated and I am capable of spending more than eight hours quality time studying.
Finally, doing different types of tasks has other advantages. People whose work consist of doing several tasks are far more talented and obtain more capabilities than those who just do one task all dey long. Since in today's world, technology improvement forces people to change jobs frequently, it's vital that workers have different abilities to guarantee they can find jobs in future. Apparently, doing various tasks make people ready for change and this is the most important factor that makes multi-task jobs more satisfactory than simple one-task jobs to workers.
To sum up, high productivity, staying motivated, and improving one's capabilities were three reasons stated to explain why multi-task jobs seem more appealing to workers. Also if I wanted to choose a job, I would definitely search for a job consisting many different types of tasks to remain satisfied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
Theres no doubt that workers worldwide prefer ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...s, I change the subject of the material Im studying regularly during a day, so tha...
^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ilities to guarantee they can find jobs in future. Apparently, doing various tasks make p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 64, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ivity, staying motivated, and improving ones capabilities were three reasons stated ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...sk jobs seem more appealing to workers. Also if I wanted to choose a job, I would de...
^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... definitely search for a job consisting many different types of tasks to remain satisfied.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, i feel, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0726744186 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.807204994 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2996792393 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905688811666 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406583617073 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332928575521 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524321939911 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328903275299 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.