EXTRA 2
In the modern era, people are endangered with a lot of detrimental issues that can affect their lives. In this way, individuals try to think about their decisions and the conclusions of that specific decision. This a controversial argument between ordinary people and experts in psychological science whether a person should make a crucial decision alone or use other peoples' ideas. In my opinion, important decisions need more thinking and asking a professional's opinion about that topic. In the following paragraphs, I will explore into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
To begin with, people have to consider the consequences of their critical decision, which means that can influence their lives, even their families. Emergencies have happened to everyone that they should make a crucial decision. But, in these specific situations, people get nervous, and they cannot contemplate all aspects of their decision, specifically the conclusion. Consequently, if someone counsels them to make adequate decisions can reduce the harmful consequences on themselves or others. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I wanted to choose my university to attend it, I had just two options in front of me. I had to decide that I want to join a university far from my hometown with a great rank in the country, or attend a university with a lower rank but in hometown. Furthermore, I need to consider my interest, independent life, and hard living far from my family. In this situation, my parents helped me to make a good decision to support my future life, which I am so pleased, now, because of my right decision to stay in my hometown. This example demonstrates that people should use other's opinion to decrease a bad consequence.
My second noteworthy reason is that using peoples' ideas and information helps us to be pacified in making important decisions. Sometimes, people want to know about other's experiences to make an efficient decision which can impress their future. For example, my friend wanted to join a company that did not pay the bills at the right time. In this way, he asked my experiences about this matter, and I tried to give him some instructive information that can affect his decision to corporate with that company or not. If I have been not given him good data, he would have not made a good decision.
To sum up, a single person should talk to others when he or she wants to make an important decision. This is because to reduce bad consequences and learn about other's experiences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-20 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 93 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | peymankaz | 3 | view |
- European silver coins which found on the site in state Maine. 73
- TPO 53 3
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 46 3
- Carved stone balls 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professionals'' or 'professional's'?
Suggestion: professionals'; professional's
...cisions need more thinking and asking a professionals opinion about that topic. In the follow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, second, so, for example, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96279069767 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89889574471 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6307427736 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.