Grades encourage students to work harder at school Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion

Essay topics:

Grades encourage students to work harder at school. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

It is critically important for students to work hard as much as possible during their school. I personally believe that giving grades to students for their work will motivate them and have a positive effect in their study. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, students who are graded achieves in depth knowledge of the academic subjects. When the students has an opportunity to earn more grade, she will spend more time on her assignments, as a result, she will gain more inside knowledge and understand the minute details about the subject of her assignment. In contrast, students who are not graded for their work, will spend only small portion of their time in that subject, as a result they will only superficially understand the subject. My personal experience as a student is a compelling illustration of this. During my second year in college, I had to complete a major assignment related to modern structural design and it makes up half of the grade of the class. Therefore, I approached my assignment with care and diligence. I spent many hours working on my assignment, gathering and understanding every minute details associated with the modern structure, so that I could present perfect assignment to get highest grade possible. If the assignment had not been graded, I would not have spent my time gathering and doing research on my project. I am sure that students all over the world today are motivated to work hard by the chance to achieve high grades from their professors.

Furthermore, grade system helps students to know the level of understanding in different academic subject. Grades are assigned in a systematic way, so it clearly demonstrates the knowledge the students have in number of subjects. As a result, student can know their strong suit and subjects which need more effort and study. For example, during my high school I was assigned to write essay about history of U.S.A. After many days of hard work I submitted the essay and was expecting to get perfect score since I did a ton of research before writing it. However, to my surprise I was given fairly low score and was said to do it again. After that I examined the subject matter with careful eyes and found that there were several errors in my understanding about cardinal events. So I improved myself and submitted it again. This time however, I got the perfect score and cleared my wrong understanding, which would not have happened if not for the grading system.

In my conclusion, I strongly believe that grads encourage students to learn. This is because they force students to learn as much as possible, and because they give students the review of knowledge on different academic subjects, and give more attention to subject if needed so that they can improve their knowledge.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-11 prakriti malla 70 view
2023-04-02 prakriti malla 73 view
2022-10-22 Bolaji 40 view
2022-08-27 wally 70 view
2022-06-18 heman@saini view
Essay Categories
Essays by user pmm :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 970, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'get the highest'.
Suggestion: get the highest
...t I could present perfect assignment to get highest grade possible. If the assignment had n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a systematic way" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t academic subject. Grades are assigned in a systematic way, so it clearly demonstrates the knowled...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in contrast, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88198757764 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72347480329 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1961378754 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.181818182 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9545454545 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13730979646 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490234619194 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340189639533 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930603355518 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168041727157 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.