Has the ease of cooking improved life?
From many erudite thinker’s points of view, although human is on the edge of civilization now, no one can turn a blind eye to a significance of cooking at home as a one of the greatest and oldest humankind’s art. Furthermore, in numerous circles of researchers and scholars, whereas some are inclined toward opinion that foods should be cooked at home and fast foods don’t have enough nutritious value and useful vitamins, on the extreme of the rope, some believe that our time is very important and we shouldn’t assign any time to cook and with having different restaurant with different ready food, we can choose our foods easily. While both sides take their own positions, from my vantage point, the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will delve into some conspicuous aspects which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason of the current discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that fast foods are made in restaurants are in an unhealthy situation that can influence our diet. For example, restaurants use different persuasive materials, a variety of artificial addictive colors and vitamins to attract customers and this leads to dangerous diseases such as heart attack and high blood pressure. So cooking at home with natural ingredients is a healthy way.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate and vindicate my standpoint concerned with this issue is that going to a restaurant every day for this reason that we don’t have enough time to cook, leads to the vanishing of one of the oldest human’s art. Food and cooking have influenced almost every step that humankind has taken so this art has a valuable position in our life. Furthermore, cooking at home can create the peaceful atmosphere and family members can come together and talk about different topics such as different methods of cooking. So this old art can be enhanced by families and should not disappear by this busy people.
To put everything in a nutshell, a broad look over the main points and discussion reveals the fact that, with less time devoted to cooking, the chances for such nutritious meals are now rare and people should go to the restaurant and eat unhealthy and innutritious foods. Furthermore, they lose the chance of coming together in a peaceful atmosphere and finally one of the oldest human’s art has been influenced by time goes on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | Nasimarian | 86 | view |
| 2023-04-30 | Nasimarian | 86 | view |
| 2022-06-16 | Rustin_Panda | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | mghcivil | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | mghcivil | 90 | view |
- Which one do you prefer：1) a company offering you a job with a challenging and interesting project but fewer vacation days or2) another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but more vacation days. 73
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship because being away from people reminds us of how important they are Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate with 67
- TPO9 Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 85
- We need zoos, are you agree or disagree? 60
- Do you agree or disagree?It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (liked by students) and effective in helping students in learning. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, whereas, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03950617284 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88283210172 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545679012346 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.6098184729 48.9658058833 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.0 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1538461538 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850158089825 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344108626876 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451084464481 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498243699236 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366368567405 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.002688172 275% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 10.247311828 273% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.