Has the ease of cooking improved life?
Yes, it has. Our life depends on food industry and how it progress. Proportion of food and cooking to us, as an analogy, is the same as fuel to car. Energy is our fuel and it is attainable just by eating. You can use healthy foods, as high-quality fuel, or unhealthy one, as low-quality fuel. Followings are some reasons to support the issue:
First of all, population of the earth planet has been growing up and it demands more food and as regards it, accelerating cooking which is important in social events, restaurants, parties etc. For instance, in a university, there are thousands of students who want to eat their meal at the university and they expect a good quality and a small defect will lead to their protesting. Easy cooking helps chefs to prepare perfect foods quickly by facilities such as ovens, big cookers, strong containers, industrial packed ingredients. So we can say that one of important benefits of easy cooking is making high-speed cooking possible at huge amount.
Betterment of community health is the other reason. Hygienic aspects of food industry, including factories, kitchens, kitchen ware, employees, increase as well as developing new technologies associated with cooking. Decreasing human intervention during preparation process have led to a revolution in restaurants and public-serve kitchen. Imagine you are starving and seeking for a good restaurant; You find your favor place but unfortunately is very crowded; Chefs and kitchen workers have to serve a kind of food many times; if they had wanted to do dishes by hand, need to fast working, would have caused overlooking contamination and this issue would have followed by customers’ disease; dish-washing machine is a boot to humanity in this situations. As a conclusion, invention new facilities to make cooking easier, will follow by a healthier society.
Admittedly, people have got used to appreciating cooking industry as a crucial phenomenon related to diary. Were it not for easy cooking appliance, a mother, who works outside, would worry about her family at lunch time; There are some technologies which help this category of people, such as microwave or toaster. Drivers can find food anywhere they feel starving and it leads to transfer our necessary amenities during night our day. I mean progressing in easy cooking has many implications in our life that we may not perceive them directly.
All in all, nobody can omit cooking role in our life. We are working all time to make money for what? answer is food to keep surviving. Easy cooking is indispensable in this era and paying enough attention to it, as if it is our goal of living, would vouch better future for our generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | Nasimarian | 86 | view |
| 2023-04-30 | Nasimarian | 86 | view |
| 2022-06-16 | Rustin_Panda | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | mghcivil | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | mghcivil | 90 | view |
- Why go to university? 70
- Some people argue that technological progress is always positive Others dispute this What is your view and why 93
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and 85
- Why go to university? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'progresses'?
Suggestion: progresses
...ife depends on food industry and how it progress. Proportion of food and cooking to us, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ashing machine is a boot to humanity in this situations. As a conclusion, invention ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Answer
...orking all time to make money for what? answer is food to keep surviving. Easy cooking...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, well, as regards, for instance, i mean, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04932735426 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9226489651 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600896860987 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.0626377533 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.363636364 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150947373772 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488572317413 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577477353523 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925772605797 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393825957666 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.