Have humans harmed the earth or make it a better place?
In the progressive world where we live, human activities developed significantly. People are modifying their surroundings to provide a high level of welfare for human beings. But the critical issue is "Are these modifications useful for the earth or no?". Some intellectuals asserted that human activities wrecked the Earth, and we should stop the acceleration of industrialization and destroying the earth. Other thinkers, are on the other side, believing that human beings not only do not hurt the earth but also do lots of beneficial movements to preserve the earth. Personally speaking, I think human kinds have harmed the earth and our activities lead the earth to the sixth mass extinction. I will explain my reasons in the following paragraphs.
In the first place, I should mention that our beautiful planet never was as injured as today is. We, selfish humans, advance our activities and widen our realm. Earth has experienced five mass extinction until now and lost lots of species including pretty plants, marine animals, useful microorganisms, and giant predator animals. One of the most well-known is dinosaurs extinction that is about sixty-five million ago. It was the fifth extinction that earth has experienced but unfortunately is not the last one. As long as human beings pitch in the earth, our planet has affected by several damages, even more than the other five ones. We deprived our descendants of several types of beautiful animals, useful microorganisms, and beneficial plants. The consequents of this deletion will affect our life directly. The melting of glaciers, increasing the temperature, high level of air pollution, and destroyed environment impact humans' daily life. For example, air pollution leads to serious diseases that affect lungs, breathing, and sometimes heart attack.
Furthermore, we not only damage the ecosystem but also enter some artificial agents by their activities that disturb the balance of the ecosystem badly. To oversee today's situation, we can easily figure out that the human-made virus, coronavirus has paralyzed the whole planet. No matter where do you live or had any distribution to made this virus or not, all the humans' life changes during this pandemic. People effort to make the earth a better living place but are they successful? I don't think so. We should establish a strict rule for all activities which may affect the environment. For instance, in the case of coronavirus, if there were a serious rule for biological activities we would not be in quarantine and our cities do not lockdown.
All in all, in my opinion, human beings' activities lead the earth to the biggest extinction. and nothing but humans have the power to do that. But the environment is going to revenge difficultly. Moreover, we enter some human-make creatures to the world that damage the ecosystem's balance. According to the reasons which I provided above, the earth harmed by human activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 896, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emperature, high level of air pollution, and destroyed environment impact humans ...
^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...tion to made this virus or not, all the humans life changes during this pandemic. Peop...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...living place but are they successful? I dont think so. We should establish a strict ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ad the earth to the biggest extinction. and nothing but humans have the power to do...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2480.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23206751055 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94434358469 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 774.9 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9716605806 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5172413793 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3448275862 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68965517241 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312065597394 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077033620071 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921130245988 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203715834912 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977949303251 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.