Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom. Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning.
In the modern world, where numbers always talk, people compete to excel in their performance to take a higher score and place higher level than others. The speaker asserts that this issue works in schools as well; students are willing to take high grades and this matter motivates them to have a good performance in the classroom and study well. However, on the other side of the spectrum, others believe that competition for high grades not only does not play a motivative role for students but also inhibits the quality of real learning. I strongly agree with the first group for two main reasons, which I will illustrate in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the innate human being is tied up with the competition. In fact, without the competitive characteristics, humans could not reach today's modern-technological societies. Trying to have a better and easier life is always a good motivator for the human being to work hard to achieve. In other words, showing superiority over others is a good reason for people to do their best. In an academic area such as a school, this competitiveness shows in getting high grades. Personally speaking, I believe that the grades that strongly tied with good academic and scientific performances are not only inhibit learning but open new doors in the world of knowledge and science that steadfast students can open up.
Secondly, students need to measure their attempts quantified and courage for their nice try. Without measurements such as grades, we cannot show the result of their attempts during the term and they may even lose the right way of studying. So, with competition for high grades students run in the way of progressing rather than driving on a road without any certain purpose or orientation.
However, Some intellectuals believe that students who are more susceptible to being stressed because of this competition for high grades, could be harmful and limit their true learning during the stressful-competitive setting. I think, nevertheless, this assertion would be true in some aspects, it is the perspicacity of a teacher or educator to set a study place where innocuous competitive flows rather than baneful and stressful one.
To sum up, competitiveness is a genetic characteristic of human beings and it is so useful to motivate them to work better. Also, students need to see the consequences of their performance to detect the right way to progress. And last but not least, it is the wisdom of a teacher to make a healthy atmosphere in the class that avoids students from becoming stressed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-15 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Prasad002 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | abhikhanna | 50 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Skittle_Mix07 | 62 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | sara2020 | 50 | view |
- individual learning or group learning 35
- What have you learn about a country from its movies 70
- Should a new restaurant be built in your neighborhood 66
- A live performance vs television broadcast 70
- Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in fact, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99838572486 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.786736545 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6111111111 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381099388762 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103330175812 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992916285959 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194972732832 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771563995468 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.