If the school asks you to do a task that requires creativity, do you prefer working alone or working a group?
Currently, the whole society is putting considerable emphasis on the education, especially the upbringing related with creativity, thus a heated discussion is evoked that which is the leading choice to nurture or germinate students’ creativity, working alone or working as a group. A myriad of individuals harbor the idea that working alone can augment the chances of finishing the task requiring creativity smoothly. However, I cannot concur with the opinion. I am a firm advocate of working as a group and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, working as a group renders us a third-person angle, which ensures us a new perspective on certain issues. To be more specific, we, students, are accustomed to fulfilling the mandated school assignments in a fixed approach, hence, under this circumstance, we are inclined to fall into the stereotype that has already fostered and our creativity is stifled. Nevertheless, working with other classmates enables us to step out of our comfort zone. The more group members involved in this task, the more thoughts are exchanged with each other, which creates the ambiance that can germinate more sparkling ideas.
What’s more, other members engaging in the same task can not only act as teammates but also act as supervisors. It is widely acknowledged that there is a propensity that we want to find shortcuts or easy way out when required to tackle a problem, despite the requirement of creativity. Hence, provided that we finish this task all by individual’s efforts, it is more likely that we fail to achieve the prerequisite of creativity. On the contrary, working as a team, each team member, at the common aim of germinating creative ideas, will supervise each other and prevents others from slacking. Under the surveillance, all members involved in this group will make concerted and joint efforts to finish this task. Since the task can be delivered to each member, not only time but also energy can be saved, which makes us finish the task more efficaciously. Here is a case in the point. Once my school organized a design competition, all students could participate as groups or engage in individually. After stiff and fierce rivalry, the results of this competition finally came out. However, the results are astonishing since a majority of participants who obtained awards are teams, not those individual participants. In accordance with those winning participants’ experience, whenever they want to surrender old designs, their partners would tell to persist in delving into the newly-introduced designs, thus little by little, they eventually came up with their own exhilarating ideas, which constituted stepping stones in their success. This example illustrates that working as a group can help us augment the opportunities of stepping out of comfort zones.
Admittedly, working by an individual is not with merit. Just as the saying goes, too many cooks spoil the broth. Sometimes an individual can liberate himself from teammates’ constraint, nevertheless, if students involved in a group can employ interpersonal and communication skills to tackle their differences existing in their thoughts, this problem can be easily tackled.
In a nutshell, I would like to reiterate my opinion that working as a group is the preferred option for us when we are mandated to fulfill a task requiring creativity because teammates enable us to come up with new and sparkling ideas and impede us from falling into the stereotype.
- Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the courses 1 Some professors who are voted to be the most popular one 2 Some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research 87
- venus is an inhospitable place for we human being to live permanently 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Physical exercise is more important to older people than to younger people 87
- Parents offer money for their school-age children for each high grade 73
- If a city has given the money to investment, which options do you prefer listed in the following 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1362, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'persisting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'tell' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: persisting
... old designs, their partners would tell to persist in delving into the newly-introduced de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, third, thus, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2957.0 1977.66487455 150% => OK
No of words: 563.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25222024867 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14541211241 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515097690941 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 925.2 618.680645161 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8063628764 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.208333333 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4583333333 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.20833333333 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192258400415 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600620196039 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539006339614 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12744088293 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685246199173 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 86.8835125448 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.