Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Mistakes are so critical in every aspect of our life. Some of them are reversable but others not. Some people believe that in classroom when teacher make a wrong point student should say nothing or wait until the class is over, others disagree and have opinion. In my view, students should interrupt and make accurate the mistake that make teacher as soon as possible for two important reasons.
First and foremost reason is that when one student make the mistake correct, teacher know he as a diligent student. Teachers have a lot of class every semester and it is so hard to remember the best student. Therefore, the best way to be conspicous is that student should try to correct his teacher’s mistake right away and get the higher score at the end of term. For example, when I was student at high school, I was so shy. I chould not ask question or say anything during the class time. This my diposition caused anybody even not to know my name. After one exam, I was wondering about my score. When I asked about it from teacher, unfortunately, she ignored me because she thought I was lazy student who do not spend time to study. However, one of my friend in mathematic class asked a lot of questions and when teacher make a mistake, he interrupted her and correct it. Surprisingly, He could get the highest score in the school. This experience show me, student should interfer and interrrupt teachers when they make the mistake in order to correct it.
Second reason is that making a mistake by teachers can harm student’s score in final exam seriously. Students rely on their teacher’s knowledge only because the do not have any information or experience. Therefore, if they do not learn correctly, they lost so much grade or maybe fail the exam. For example, when I was at elementary school, my science knowledge was so poor. I had to memorize only information which I wrote druin the class time. During the final exam, I was hesitate to select A or B. So, I decided to choose A due to my knowledge from my teacher. Astonishingly, I failed the exam because my teacher made a serious mistake and I did not know it was incorrect. As you can see, if someone corrected teacher’s mistake that day, I could continoued my study further.
In concolusion, it is okay sometimes teachers distract or lose their focus and make a mistake but it is mandatory for everyone to correct their mistake right away. If no one do this, not only maybe cause some student fail the coures but also student could not get higher score because their teacher not know him. Therefore, student should raise their hand and be polit to correct teacher’s mistake.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... their teacher’s knowledge only because the do not have any information or experience....
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hesitated'.
Suggestion: hesitated
...lass time. During the final exam, I was hesitate to select A or B. So, I decided to choo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66452991453 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59059233363 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470085470085 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3267189908 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8518518519 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03703703704 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175949819612 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547755083262 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046611961962 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122979180826 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169406909934 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.