Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
-Say nothing.
With the advancement of technology, information resources have grown fast and people have access to these resources from everywhere and every time. Sometimes, some people as teacher or meeting leaders use information without attention to information's accuracy. If I were a student or took part in a meeting, definitely I would choose the first idea and interrupt teacher's speech and correct the mistake right way.
To begin with, a teacher or lecturer must know they are responsible when they give information to students or people. They have to prepare themselves to face some challenges like answer some questions. Thus, the teacher or lecturer must expect that if he or she says something wrong, others may correct his mistake. For example, a few months ago, in one of the radio program, an expert speak about one of the foreign poets but he read the name of poet incorrectly but at the moment, one of the audiences called online phone to the radio station and made the expert's mistake right away.
In addition, when teacher or lecturer says something incorrect in my opinion If others say nothing, it is possible, this incorrect information share between students or people and they may use this information in exams or daily life. For instance, when I was university student, I took computer networks course. One day the university held a seminar about cloud networks and most of the students took part in this seminar. There, one of the lecturers had been talking about how to calculate the Internet traffic on the network and provided us new formula about this issue but on the slide, there were some irrational problems that came from type mistake. However, one of the students noticed that. He was allowed to mention type mistake of formula on the slide. After that, the lecturer was very glad that the students paid attention to his lecture and follow his lecture correctly.
In conclusion, it is very important that teacher or lecturer provides correct information to people. In my view, when a teacher or lecturer says something mistake, students or people should correct his mistake because people probably use this incorrect information and then share them with others. Thus, to avoid from the spread of wrong information, it is better listeners listen to people's speak accurately.
- Some people like to work in teams. Others prefer to work alone. which do you prefer? 80
- The best thing in life do not cost money 76
- TPO 23 73
- The things we learn from our friends are more important than what we learn from our family 80
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait until the class or meeting is 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, talking about, in my opinion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02356020942 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63931084443 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513089005236 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7384257816 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.882352941 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151577642156 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496050894877 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547606802716 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102677254099 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285107538564 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.